Closed daniel-lewis-ab closed 2 months ago
Has this been closed without any discussion, or for other reasons?
I hadn't heard any discussion, and it's been a while.
My fork currently has a AFAIK working partial upgrade to ES6. I'm working on getting the rest of it converted to classes before moving forward to the next step. I'm open to hearing what that ought to be, but there's quite a bit to upgrade to modern JS.
Regards, Daniel
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 11:51 PM Andy @.***> wrote:
Has this been closed without any discussion, or for other reasons?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jagenjo/litegraph.js/pull/442#issuecomment-1974477792, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC36LNYJNTO5PEWRLEXTFDTYWFZHDAVCNFSM6AAAAABCVWQRW6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZUGQ3TONZZGI . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>
Hi,
So I went through and cracked open the litegraph.js file into separate JS files. This is a first seemingly necessary step to upgrading and maintaining the code, documenting it, etc.
I wanted discussion as to whether anyone wanted to have this not happen for their particular project.
Please review the changes and decide whether it's a correct path forward for you. I'm going to move on with upgrading my codebase.