search

jcp-org / jsr358

0 stars 0 forks source link

JSR358-68: Should the review period be extended when an Expert Group publishes an update to a milestone draft? #48

Closed apastsya closed 7 years ago

apastsya commented 10 years ago

Jira issue originally created by user pcurran:

Sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 of the Process Document encourage the Expert Group to update the milestone draft to take community feedback into consideration.

When this happens, should the review period be extended (perhaps automatically)? This is particularly important when a ballot is approaching since it seems unreasonable for the EC to review one version of a draft and then be presented with a radically different version days before the ballot is due to start.

Alternatively, we could simply prohibit changes during review (to avoid the confusion of different people reviewing different versions of a document) and simply require a second draft later if the EG wants to make changes.

apastsya commented 10 years ago
apastsya commented 9 years ago

Comment created by pcurran:

This is fixed in the version of the Process Document being developed through JSR 364.

apastsya commented 9 years ago

Issue was closed with resolution "Fixed"