search

jcp-org / jsr358

0 stars 0 forks source link

JSR358-16: PMO should not be involved in Early Draft Review #6

Open apastsya opened 12 years ago

apastsya commented 12 years ago

Jira issue originally created by user shannon:

Given the new transparency requirements, there seems to be little gained by involving the PMO in Early Draft Review. It would be easier for the EG to publish its draft specs on its project web site for review, whenever it wants, as often as it wants, for as long as it wants, without having to inform the PMO.

apastsya commented 12 years ago
apastsya commented 12 years ago

Comment created by pcurran:

We discussed this at the September 21 Working Group meeting, and agreed that there is value to having a formal review process. (Note also that we tie this to the time-out requirements.)

I'm closing this for now, but have added it to the JSR2 list for future consideration.

apastsya commented 12 years ago

Comment created by shannon:

I think it's sufficient that the formal review process start with Public Review. Ditto the timeout.

apastsya commented 12 years ago

Comment created by pcurran:

I still don't want to make such an extensive change at this late stage.

I reopened, and deferred the issue. We'll look at it again later...

apastsya commented 11 years ago

Comment created by keilw:

As there are Renewal Ballots now actively conducted, does this still make sense, at least the "review, whenever it wants, as often as it wants, for as long as it wants, without having to inform the PMO." part?