jj101k / eximport

0 stars 0 forks source link

eximport

This module brings support for ECMAScript 6 import/export statements to your projects.

This was forked from the unmaintained import-export package.

This exists because Node itself (as of 12.x LTS) does not enable ES6 module support by default - see https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v12.x/api/esm.html - and you can't insist that everybody runs node with --experimental-modules just to load your module. If/when Node gets production ES6 module support this package will become redundant and probably stop being maintained, because more complicated scenarios absolutely require that you can rearrange the AST.

Usage

In your top-level .js file require this module before your other project includes. Node's module loader will be hooked to rewrite both import and export statements into mutually compatible wrappers.

e.g. you might have an index.js like:

require("eximport")
module.exports = require("./src/foo")

...and a src/foo.js like:

import Bar from "./bar"
Bar.baz()

...and a src/bar.js like:

class Bar {
  static baz() {
    console.log("Hello World")
  }
}
export default Bar

Return from require()

This returns an EximportBridgeNamespace object via eximport-bridge.

When you're using require() with an import/export module, you may either want to expose the whole namespace (require(...)), just the default (require(...).default) or a specific named export (require(...).Foo)

How this works

At a simple level, import {Foo} from "./foo" is the same as var Foo = require("./foo").Foo. Unfortunately it's not quite that simple because "export" hoists (its names exist before the code delaring them is executed), which is very valuable when you have circular references but needs to be emulated here.

Instead, the code import {Foo} from "./foo" becomes roughly:

var Foo = require("./foo").Foo // Original line position
// Other code before the main script run starts...
Foo = require("./foo").Foo

This means that we can fill in the namespace entry early and then before anything really uses it we can insert the final value. Specifically, we can do that as soon as the exporting module body execution finishes.

The initial "var" line has to appear at its original (presumably top) level; by doing so it inserts an entry directly into the correct namespace. It won't work inside a function. Once the name exists, plain assignment in any scope which inherits the original namespace is fine, so the second half is done via a callback function. It doesn't make sense to do a second assingment once the module's evaluation is complete, so at that point the callback handler is dummied out and any pending callbacks executed.

On the exporting side, export Foo becomes roughly:

module.exports.Foo = null
// Other module code...
module.exports.Foo = Foo // Original line position
// Other module code...

This ensures that the names all exist before any other code's import returns, and sets the correct value once it's known. It's necessary to do this in two stages because only one type of value has both its declaration and value hoisted: explicitly named functions.

Notes/bugs & Known Limitations

Self-modifying

This cannot modify the file it's required in.

 Complex Expressions

Due to the use of regexps, complex expressions won't be parseable. For example, you might want to write:

export var foo=`export var bar=${baz.join(",") + `}`}`

That's simply not going to work unless the filter has a full understanding of Javascript syntax and the ability to parse recursively, which isn't possible in regular expressions. If you've got expressions like that, just split them into a plain export (which eximport can handle) and the relevant assignment/expression (which the Javascript engine can handle).

You might in some cases have a non-export/non-import expression which is picked up as an export or import - if so, that's an unknown bug, and you should consider reporting it if the code in question isn't pathological.