The DHT (22 or 11) uses a 1-Wire protocol, which is not compatible with the Dallas Semicondutors protocol of the same name. The Raspberry Pico (like other microcontrollers) has no dedicated peripherals for this protocol.
Numerous crates exist for using DHT via a digital pin, but after testing several of them, they don't work reliably. The main problem is the implementation of the embedded_hal by rp2040_hal. Manipulating the state and direction of a pin takes too long (I measured between 2µs and 6µs depending on the action requested). This is due, among other things, to the impossibility of placing a pin in open drain, which requires "simulating" this feature
The RP2040 chip (used for the Pico) has a rather atypical peripheral called PIO (Programmable Input/Output), Chapter 3 of the DataSheet. In simple terms, the idea is to be able to run a small program (max. 32 instructions), which executes independently. It can manipulate GPIOs and share information with the main program.
The PIO is programmed using an assembler called pioasm
, with just a few very basic instructions. What's interesting is that each instruction takes (usually) 1 cycle to execute. What's more, it's possible to divide the clock at which the program executes. In our case the implementation obtains the system clock and set the PIO's clock to execute one instruction per microsecond.
Add this crate on your cargo.toml
, use:
cargo add dht-pio --features rp2040
for a board based on rp2040
(for example Raspberry PI Pico) or
cargo add dht-pio --features rp235x
for a board based on rp235x
(for example Raspberry PI Pico2).
You can also add defmt
feature if you need a pretty-print of Dht{11,22}Result
or DhtError
and you use the crate defmt
.
In the code, create and retrieve the PIO objects
let (dht_pio, dht_sm, _, _, _) = pac.PIO0.split(&mut pac.RESETS);
To create a new object:
let mut dht = Dht22::new(dht_pio, dht_sm, pins.gpio0.into_function(), &clocks);
let mut dht = Dht11::new(dht_pio, dht_sm, pins.gpio0.into_function(), &clocks);
Read data:
let dht_data = dht.read(&mut delay);
NB: read
returns a Result<Dht11Result, DhtError>
when reading from Dht11
sensor and return a Result<Dht22Result, DhtError>
when reading from Dht22
or Dht22Type2
. The difference is that the Dht11Result
contains temperature
and humidity
expresses with u16
the other in f32
the reason is because the Dht11
sensor returns only integer non negative values.
It seems that there are two versions of DHT22. I haven't found anything really conclusive, but what is certain is that not all DHT22s have the same data format... In one case the format is the same as presented in (almost) all datasheets, i.e. the most significant bit is set to 1
if the number is negative, but the binary representation of the absolute temperature value is not changed. For example:
0000 0000 0110 1001
= 105 or 10.5°C1000 0000 0110 1001
= 32873 or -10.5°CThis is how the Dht22
struct will "decode" the data coming from the sensor.
However, I've come across sensors that don't work like this at all. But in a (ultimately) more logical way. Since the data is represented in two's complement. In this case, use Dht22Type2
. For example:
0000 0000 0110 1001
= 105 i.e. 10.5°C1111 1111 1001 0111
= 65431 i.e. -10.5°CTo simplify, if your sensor is a DHT22 but the values don't seem consistent (negative values), then try "Type 2" (and if nothing really works, open an issue 😉 ).
The crate is tested with Raspberry Pico and Raspberry Pico2.
✅ DHT22
✅ DHT11
Geir Ertzaas (grukx), for actively discover (too many?) bugs.