Closed pktiuk closed 4 years ago
Could you explain the reason for adding libc6 as a dependency? This is one of the basic elements of the system. I doubt it makes any sense to add it as a dependency in this particular case.
While the other commites make some sense, the one with the addition of libc6, in my opinion, does not.
@sirlucjan This is one of the requirements for packages in Debian repositories. Just check current package with lintian and you will see in-depth (in terminal every error has hyperlink) description for every one of these warnings and errors. https://lintian.debian.org/tags/missing-dependency-on-libc.html
In that case, it seems to make sense. Years of using other Linux distributions change habits - frankly speaking, I have never encountered such a bug.
namcap antimicrox-git-3.0.r61.gffa39301-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst
antimicrox-git W: Referenced library 'libantilib.so.1' is an uninstalled dependency
We learn every day. :smile: I gonna trust more experienced devs and their docs. For now, I will try to fix the rest of these problems with the package, it would make (in long run) possible adding AntiMicroX to official Debian/Ubuntu repositories.
Removed also
E: antimicrox: manpage-not-compressed-with-max-compression usr/share/man/man1/antimicroX.1.gz
Some improvements in packaging according to Debain guidelines and usage of
lintian
. According to lintian there are still some things requiring fixes:But it is nothing urgent, but it would be necessary if we would want to add AntimicroX to Debian repositories.