search

jveitchmichaelis / edgetpu-yolo

Minimal-dependency Yolov5 and Yolov8 export and inference demonstration for the Google Coral EdgeTPU
103 stars 31 forks source link
deep-learning edgetpu edgetpu-exporter google-coral yolov5s

readme

[TOC]

Introduction

In this repository we'll explore how to run a state-of-the-art object detection mode, Yolov5, on the Google Coral EdgeTPU.

This project was submitted to, and won, Ultralytic's competition for edge device deployment in the EdgeTPU category. The notes for the competition are at the bottom of this file, for reference.

Probably the most interesting aspect for people stumbling across this is that this project requires very few runtime dependencies (it doesn't even need PyTorch). It contains comprehensive benchmarking code, examples of how to compile and run a custom model on the EdgeTPU and a discussion of how to test on real edge hardware.

TL;DR (see the Dockerfile):

sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get -y upgrade
sudo apt-get install -y git curl gnupg

# Install PyCoral (you don't need to do this on a Coral Board)
echo "deb https://packages.cloud.google.com/apt coral-edgetpu-stable main" | tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/coral-edgetpu.list
curl https://packages.cloud.google.com/apt/doc/apt-key.gpg | apt-key add -
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y gasket-dkms libedgetpu1-std python3-pycoral

# Get Python dependencies
sudo apt-get install -y python3 python3-pip
pip3 install --upgrade pip setuptools wheel
python3 -m pip install numpy
python3 -m pip install opencv-python-headless
python3 -m pip install tqdm pyyaml

# Clone this repository
git clone https://github.com/jveitchmichaelis/edgetpu-yolo
cd edgetpu-yolo

# Run the test script
python3 detect.py -m yolov5s-int8-224_edgetpu.tflite --bench_image

Wasn't that easy? You can swap out different models and try other images if you like. You should see an inference speed of around 25 fps with a 224x224 px input model.

Note if you're using a PCIe accelerator, you will need to install an appropriate kernel driver. See the hardware notes for more information.

Dev/Further instructions

  1. Hardware setup (hardware.md)
    • Briefly covers setup for the Coral Dev Board(s)
    • Covers electrical and mechanical setup for the Jetson Nano, EdgeTPU driver installation, etc.
  2. On-device software setup (software.md)
    • Setting up virtual environments and Docker
    • Installing pycoral and related libraries
    • Notes on installing PyTorch, OpenCV etc from source [for development and testing work]
  3. Model generation and export (export.md)
    • Exporting a TFLite model from PyTorch
    • Notes on the edgetpu_compiler

Running Inference

As the introduction says, all you need to do is install the dependencies and then run:

python3 detect.py -m yolov5s-int8-224_edgetpu.tflite --bench_speed
python3 detect.py -m yolov5s-int8-224_edgetpu.tflite --bench_image

This should give you first a speed benchmark (on 100 images - edit the file if you want to run more) and then on the Zidane test image (you should get two detections for the 224 model).

I've also included an (untested) option to run from a video stream.

The provided code is pretty much the minimal you need to get going with the TPU. It provides a simple class for loading the model and running inference. There are also a few utilities copied from Yolov5 for image annotation, but it's very basic at this stage.

You can also use the EdgeTPUModel class in your own software quite easily:

from edgetpumodel EdgeTPUModel
from utils import get_image_tensor

model = EdgeTPUModel("model_name", "names.yaml")
input_shape = model.get_input_shape()

full_image, net_image, pad = get_image_tensor("/path/to/image", input_shape[0])
pred = model.predict(net_image)

It's not yet ready for production(!) but you should find it easy to adapt.

Docker

If you want, you can run everything inside a Docker container. I've set it up so that you should mount this repository as an external volume (easier for experimenting/modifying files on the fly).

cd docker
docker build -t edgetpu .

docker run -it --rm --privileged -v /path/to/repo:/yolo edgetpu bash
> cd /yolo
> python3 detect.py -m yolov5s-int8-224_edgetpu.tflite --bench_speed

Performance seems to be slightly faster in Docker, perhaps due to updated versions of some libraries?

Benchmarks/Performance

Here is the result of running three different models. All benchmarks were performed using an M.2 accelerator on a Jetson Nano 4GB. Settings are conf_threshof 0.25, iou_thresh of 0.45. If you fiddle these so you get more bounding boxes, speed will decrease as NMS takes more time.

(py36) josh@josh-jetson:~/code/edgetpu_yolo$ python3 detect.py -m yolov5s-int8-96_edgetpu.tflite --bench_speed
INFO:EdgeTPUModel:Loaded 80 classes
INFO:__main__:Performing test run
100%|¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦| 100/100 [00:01<00:00, 58.28it/s]
INFO:__main__:Inference time (EdgeTPU): 13.40 +- 1.68 ms
INFO:__main__:NMS time (CPU): 0.43 +- 0.39 ms
INFO:__main__:Mean FPS: 72.30

(py36) josh@josh-jetson:~/code/edgetpu_yolo$ python3 detect.py -m yolov5s-int8-192_edgetpu.tflite --bench_speed
INFO:EdgeTPUModel:Loaded 80 classes
INFO:__main__:Performing test run
100%|¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦| 100/100 [00:03<00:00, 30.85it/s]
INFO:__main__:Inference time (EdgeTPU): 26.43 +- 4.09 ms
INFO:__main__:NMS time (CPU): 0.77 +- 0.35 ms
INFO:__main__:Mean FPS: 36.77

(py36) josh@josh-jetson:~/code/edgetpu_yolo$ python3 detect.py -m yolov5s-int8-224_edgetpu.tflite --bench_speed
INFO:EdgeTPUModel:Loaded 80 classes
INFO:__main__:Performing test run
100%|¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦| 100/100 [00:03<00:00, 25.15it/s]
INFO:__main__:Inference time (EdgeTPU): 33.31 +- 3.69 ms
INFO:__main__:NMS time (CPU): 0.76 +- 0.12 ms
INFO:__main__:Mean FPS: 29.35

I would say that 96x96 is probably unusable unless it was a model that was properly quantisation-aware trained and was for a very limited task (see accuracy results below).

224px gives good results on standard images, e.g. zidane, but it might not always find the tie. This is quite normal for edge-based models with small inputs.

You could attempt to tile the model on larger images which may give reasonable results.

MS COCO Benchmarking

Note that benchmarks use the same parameters as Ultralytics/yolov5; conf=0.001, iou=0.65. These settings significantly slow down performance due to the large number of bounding boxes created (and NMS'd). You will find that inference speed drops up to 50%. There are sample prediction files in the repo for the default conf=0.25/iou=0.45 - these result in a slightly lower mAP but are much faster.

Performance is considerably worse than the benchmarks on yolov5s.pt, however this is a post-training quantised model on images 3x smaller.

There are prediction.json files for each model in the coco_eval folder. You can re-run with:

python3 detect.py -m yolov5s-int8-224_edgetpu.tflite --bench_coco --coco_path /home/josh/data/coco/images/val2017/ -q

The q option silences logging to stdout. You may wish to turn this off to see that stuff is being detected.

Once you've run this, you can run the coco_eval.py script to process the results. Run with something like:

python3 eval_coco.py --coco_path /home/josh/data/coco/images/val2017/ --pred_pat ./coco_eval/yolov5s-int8-192_edgetpu.tflite_predictions.json --gt_path /home/josh/data/coco/annotations/instances_val2017.json

and you should get out something like:

(py36) josh@josh-jetson:~/code/edgetpu_yolo$ python3 eval_coco.py --coco_path /home/josh/data/coco/images/val2017/ --pred_pat ./coco_eval/yolov5s-int8-224_edgetpu.tflite_predictions.json --gt_path /home/josh/data/coco/annotations/instances_val2017.json
INFO:COCOEval:Looking for: /home/josh/data/coco/images/val2017/*.jpg
loading annotations into memory...
Done (t=1.92s)
creating index...
index created!
Loading and preparing results...
DONE (t=0.45s)
creating index...
index created!
Running per image evaluation...
Evaluate annotation type *bbox*
DONE (t=52.38s).
Accumulating evaluation results...
DONE (t=8.63s).
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.158
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50      | area=   all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.251
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.75      | area=   all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.168
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.012
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.136
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.329
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=  1 ] = 0.150
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets= 10 ] = 0.185
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.185
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.012
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.158
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.397
INFO:COCOEval:mAP: 0.15768057519574114
INFO:COCOEval:mAP50: 0.25142469970806514

Ultralytics Competition Notes

This repository is an entry into the Ultralytics export challenge for the EdgeTPU. It provides the following solution: