Peer Review 2

[kaavyakalani26]

Main page

• Folders structures nicely
• The title of the readme needs to be updated
• The overview of the readme needs to be updated
• LLM usage is missing
• License year and owner name needs to be updated

Inputs Folder

• inputs/data look good
• inputs/literature and inputs/llm seem to contain files from the started folder so make sure to either update the contents of this folder or remove it if not necessary

Outputs Folder

• outputs/data and outputs/model seem to contain files from the started folder so make sure to either update the contents of this folder or remove it if not necessary

Scripts Folder

• All the files in this folder ar from the starter file. Update the folder with the simulation, data downloading, data cleaning, data testing and replication script.

Paper

• Interesting choice of topic!
• Add a link to your repo and the link to find your replication contents in the footnote
• The title is straighforward. You might want to come up with a more creative title after your analysis is done but the current one works as well.
• The abstract looks good and concise. It does it's job to let the reader have a gist of the paper and know what they can expect from it.

Our study not only validates the original findings but also delves into the disparities in years of experience, and other potential variables —

• This line seems incomplete, maybe you want to list what are the other variables.
• The introduction is written nicely. Do not forget to update the "We use —- to find out —-. We observe a significant —- in our analysis, which reveals that —-." once your analysis is complete
• The data section looks good.
• Add a caption for Table 1 and use inline referencing to reference it when talking about it instead of just writing "Table 1"
• Discussion about Figure 1 is pending
• Model set up looks good but maybe you could explain what the model is in more detail so a wider audience can understand your paper better.
• The results and discussion section is empty right now so I cannot provide feedback on that
• Make sure to include your references. Do not forget to cite R especially!!
• Consider adding a table of contents so that the reader knows whats to come and where to find what.
• Overall your paper looks like it is headed in a strong direction. Do add visualisations and complete the results and discussions to finish the paper. Excited to see the complete paper.

[Kjeongwoo99]

Thank you very much.

[kakaomonk]

Thank you for your feedback in a well-organized format. We will make some changes!