kammerje / fouriever

A single toolkit for calibrations, correlations, and companion search for kernel-phase, aperture masking, and long-baseline interferometry data.
6 stars 6 forks source link

fouriever

A single toolkit for calibrations, correlations, and companion search for kernel phase, aperture masking, and long-baseline interferometry data.

Description

This toolkit combines different pieces of code that I developed mainly during my PhD. The major ideas come from CANDID and pynrm. Collaborators include Antoine Merand, Mike Ireland, Frantz Martinache, Tomas Stolker, and Thomas Vandal. The ultimate purpose is a common framework to analyze and fit kernel phase, aperture masking, and long-baseline interferometry data. At the moment, a major focus lies on JWST/NIRCam & JWST/NIRISS kernel phase and JWST/NIRISS aperture masking interferometry.

Currently, the toolkit contains the following functionalities:

Future updates will include:

Tutorials

There are several tutorials and test data sets provided that can be used to test and explore the functionalities of the fouriever toolkit. We note that the toolkit does currently understand OIFITS files and kernel phase FITS files. The following test data sets are provided:

Examples

AX Cir, with correlations and bandwidth smearing.

Opened PIONIER_Pnat(1.6135391/1.7698610) data
   50 observations
   6 baselines
   4 triangles
   3 wavelengths
Selected instrument = PIONIER_Pnat(1.6135391/1.7698610)
   Use self.set_inst(inst) to change the selected instrument
Selected observables = ['v2', 'cp']
   Use self.set_observables(observables) to change the selected observables

Chi-squared map and model vs. data plot:

Data properties
   Smallest spatial scale = 2.0 mas
   Bandwidth smearing FOV = 34.9 mas
   Diffraction FOV = 221.9 mas
   Largest spatial scale = 34.9 mas
   Bandwidth smearing = 3
   Using data covariance = True
   WARNING: covariance matrix does not have full rank
Computing best fit uniform disk diameter (DO NOT TRUST UNCERTAINTIES)
   Best fit uniform disk diameter = 0.93084 +/- 0.00048 mas
   Best fit red. chi2 = 0.811 (ud)
Computing grid
   Min. sep. = 2.0 mas
   Max. sep. = 41.7 mas
   1352 non-empty grid cells
Computing chi-squared map (DO NOT TRUST UNCERTAINTIES)
   Cell 1849 of 1849
   1121 unique minima found after 1352 fits
   Optimal step size = 2.0 mas
   Current step size = 2.0 mas
   Best fit companion flux = 0.937 +/- 0.053 %
   Best fit companion right ascension = 6.3 +/- 0.1 mas
   Best fit companion declination = -28.5 +/- 0.1 mas
   Best fit companion separation = 29.2 +/- 0.1 mas
   Best fit companion position angle = 167.6 +/- 0.1 deg
   Best fit uniform disk diameter = 0.81562 +/- 0.00776 mas
   Best fit red. chi2 = 0.589 (ud+bin)
   Significance of companion = 8.0 sigma

Figure 1 Figure 2

MCMC chains and posterior:

Computing best fit uniform disk and companion parameters (UNCERTAINTIES FROM MCMC)
   Bandwidth smearing = 3
   Using data covariance = True
   WARNING: covariance matrix does not have full rank
   Covariance inflation factor = 0.589
   This may take a few minutes
100%|███████████████████████████████████████| 5000/5000 [03:05<00:00, 27.01it/s]
   Best fit companion flux = 0.934 +/- 0.040 %
   Best fit companion right ascension = 6.2 +/- 0.1 mas
   Best fit companion declination = -28.5 +/- 0.1 mas
   Best fit companion separation = 29.2 +/- 0.1 mas
   Best fit companion position angle = 167.7 +/- 0.1 deg
   Best fit uniform disk diameter = 0.81599 +/- 0.00734 mas
   Best fit red. chi2 = 0.589 (ud+bin)
   Significance of companion = 8.0 sigma

Figure 3 Figure 4

Chi-squared map and model vs. data plot of residuals:

Subtracting ud_bin model
Data properties
   Smallest spatial scale = 2.0 mas
   Bandwidth smearing FOV = 34.9 mas
   Diffraction FOV = 221.9 mas
   Largest spatial scale = 34.9 mas
   Bandwidth smearing = 3
   Using data covariance = True
   WARNING: covariance matrix does not have full rank
Computing best fit uniform disk diameter (DO NOT TRUST UNCERTAINTIES)
   Best fit uniform disk diameter = 0.81601 +/- 0.00046 mas
   Best fit red. chi2 = 0.589 (ud)
Computing grid
   Min. sep. = 2.0 mas
   Max. sep. = 41.7 mas
   1352 non-empty grid cells
Computing chi-squared map (DO NOT TRUST UNCERTAINTIES)
   Cell 1849 of 1849
   1283 unique minima found after 1352 fits
   Optimal step size = 2.0 mas
   Current step size = 2.0 mas
   Best fit companion flux = 0.414 +/- 0.013 %
   Best fit companion right ascension = -20.1 +/- 0.3 mas
   Best fit companion declination = -20.5 +/- 0.3 mas
   Best fit companion separation = 28.7 +/- 0.3 mas
   Best fit companion position angle = -135.4 +/- 0.6 deg
   Best fit uniform disk diameter = 0.75897 +/- 0.00222 mas
   Best fit red. chi2 = 0.546 (ud+bin)
   Significance of companion = 2.4 sigma

Figure 5 Figure 6

Detection limits of residuals using Absil and Injection method:

Subtracting ud_bin model
Data properties
   Smallest spatial scale = 2.0 mas
   Bandwidth smearing FOV = 34.9 mas
   Diffraction FOV = 221.9 mas
   Largest spatial scale = 34.9 mas
   Bandwidth smearing = 3
   Using data covariance = True
   WARNING: covariance matrix does not have full rank
Computing best fit uniform disk diameter (DO NOT TRUST UNCERTAINTIES)
   Best fit uniform disk diameter = 0.81601 +/- 0.00046 mas
   Best fit red. chi2 = 0.589 (ud)
Computing grid
   Min. sep. = 2.0 mas
   Max. sep. = 41.7 mas
   1352 non-empty grid cells
Computing detection limits (3-sigma)
   Cell 1849 of 1849

Figure 7