Closed wbuthod closed 5 years ago
I should mention that imf.inverse_imf does not ignore the mmax kwarg:
>>> max([imf.inverse_imf(imf.np.random.uniform(),mmin=90.01, mmax=200.0) for _ in range(1000)])
199.6108355378401
>>> max([imf.inverse_imf(imf.np.random.uniform(),mmin=90.01, mmax=300.0) for _ in range(1000)])
299.6146391509267
Good catch, this was because of a failure to pass the mmax
kwarg correctly. A fix is forthcoming.
Fixed in 48d15a050717a840961c37167924f9017daf7b7d
Cluster minimum value corresponds to mmin kwarg, but mmax seems fixed at 120: