Closed kshawkin closed 7 years ago
Sep. 2016 work group discussion - agree with Peter's comment above
Recommendation, at level 3, put bibliography and refs in a <div type="bibliography">
, with <listBibl>
which will contain <bibl>
s with no further detail marked.
Open question - what do is the Level 4 recommendation? how much detail within <bibl>
to have at that level. No decision yet.
Level 4: require Author or editor of whole work, title and date. Can have access to the rest of the elements that can appear within <bibl>
.
Note that for level 3, may want to allow some phrase level elements inside <bibl>
need to do prose and schema
Elli's comment above is what we decided during BPTL call on 2017-02-13. We also decided to require use of @when
on <date>
.
Note that in the table of elements for Level 4, we use "recommended" for thing that are required and "optional" for things that are not required. This is because, as described in the introduction:
As guidelines rather than a specification, these Best Practices use should instead of must in nearly all cases (except where a practice is required by P5), with optional practices indicated by may. However, to encourage conformance to these Best Practices, the ODD files will generate schemas that require use of recommended elements (indicated by should).
However, this could change based on how we resolve https://github.com/kshawkin/Best-Practices-for-TEI-in-Libraries/issues/52 .
Still need to assign to someone to implement.
@type="bibliography"
in Element Recommendations for Level 3 <div>
body
( if attached to a chapter, for ex.) or back
. <head>
should be in the div
and not the listBibl
. <bibl>
. hi
can appear, however. <listBibl>
from the table of elements.bibl
and indicate that it should contain bibliographic sub-elements
-no need to change the schemaFixed at f1f222d.
We give no guidance on encoding bibliographies, lists of works cited, lists of references, and other such things in documents. In TEI, you would use listBibl for this. We need to decide: