Closed kshawkin closed 6 years ago
Try changing egXML@corresp
into egXML@source
and see if they render better.
As for citation inserted at https://github.com/kshawkin/Best-Practices-for-TEI-in-Libraries/commit/63bc9c61dd9b901904108575c9e70469020406ad , I should wrap the bibl
in a note
.
Now ready for @sydb to regenerate HTML to test rendering. Maybe this will fix point (2) in this issue.
At https://github.com/kshawkin/Best-Practices-for-TEI-in-Libraries/commit/ff6a1670963647ce2f8d516d737f34a785a0937a , https://github.com/kshawkin/Best-Practices-for-TEI-in-Libraries/commit/23074ea83f307e85c8c5fbec4a859e7a3713bb38 , and https://github.com/kshawkin/Best-Practices-for-TEI-in-Libraries/commit/c54bc4d330ee37634ac2a88cd84285901a447ca3 , I've wrapped remaining bibl
s in note
s and formatted according to Chicago style (citations using author-date method).
Various ODD files composing the BPTL use
<bibl>
(and maybe<biblStruct>
?) to cite sources in our prose or examples. There are a few problems:<bibl>
s right after the source, and the stylesheet renders them right there inline, which looks okay after a code sample but not in other places (like the citation inserted at https://github.com/kshawkin/Best-Practices-for-TEI-in-Libraries/commit/63bc9c61dd9b901904108575c9e70469020406ad ). We should probably gather these into an endnotes section.