Closed dwertent closed 7 months ago
PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/kubescape/operator/commit/2c130dbce32171459f1d3891b1a729cf3221b633)
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 2, because the changes are mostly renaming and reorganizing existing test identifiers, which is straightforward to review. However, understanding the context and ensuring that the new names correctly reflect their purpose requires some domain knowledge. |
🧪 Relevant tests | No |
🔍 Possible issues | Clarity in Naming: While the renaming aims to improve clarity, it's essential to ensure that the new test identifiers ('vuln_scan', 'vuln_scan_trigger_scan_public_registry', etc.) are clear and unambiguous to all team members. |
Test Coverage: The addition of test identifiers for checking public registry connectivity is positive. However, it's crucial to verify that these new tests are comprehensive and effectively cover all necessary scenarios. | |
🔒 Security concerns | No |
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more. |
Auto-approve PRsBy invoking: ``` /review auto_approve ``` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: ``` [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true ``` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: ``` [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5 ``` |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
Category | Suggestions |
Enhancement |
Consolidate
___
**Consider consolidating the |
Add tests for new scenarios in the vulnerability scanning process.___ **Add tests for new scenarios that may arise from the changes in the vulnerability scanningprocess, such as handling new types of vulnerabilities or changes in the vulnerability database structure.** [.github/workflows/pr-merged.yaml [54-55]](https://github.com/kubescape/operator/pull/214/files#diff-d171229d8816dfbc2f3d1a5af7874334d947f2c2e531e575cc84216793d86b49R54-R55) ```diff -"vuln_scan_test_public_registry_connectivity_by_backend", -"vuln_scan_test_public_registry_connectivity_excluded_by_backend", +"vuln_scan_new_vulnerability_types", +"vuln_scan_database_structure_change", ``` | |
Best practice |
Ensure new tests cover all scenarios from removed tests.___ **Ensure that the newvuln_scan tests cover all scenarios previously covered by the vulnerability_scanning tests that were removed. This includes not only the registry types and triggering conditions but also any specific configurations or edge cases that were previously tested.** [.github/workflows/pr-merged.yaml [40-44]](https://github.com/kubescape/operator/pull/214/files#diff-d171229d8816dfbc2f3d1a5af7874334d947f2c2e531e575cc84216793d86b49R40-R44) ```diff -"vuln_scan", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_public_registry", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_public_registry_excluded", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_private_quay_registry", -"vuln_scan_triggering_with_cron_job", +"vuln_scan_complete_suite", ``` |
Maintainability |
Improve the clarity and consistency of test naming.___ **Review the naming convention of the newvuln_scan tests to ensure consistency and clarity. Consider using a more descriptive naming scheme that includes the action being tested and the context (e.g., registry type or triggering condition).** [.github/workflows/pr-merged.yaml [40-44]](https://github.com/kubescape/operator/pull/214/files#diff-d171229d8816dfbc2f3d1a5af7874334d947f2c2e531e575cc84216793d86b49R40-R44) ```diff -"vuln_scan", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_public_registry", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_public_registry_excluded", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_private_quay_registry", -"vuln_scan_triggering_with_cron_job", +"vuln_scan_public_registry_manual", +"vuln_scan_public_registry_excluded_manual", +"vuln_scan_private_registry_manual", +"vuln_scan_cron_triggered", ``` |
Performance |
Ensure new tests do not significantly increase execution time.___ **Verify that the addition of newvuln_scan tests does not significantly increase the overall test suite execution time. If it does, consider strategies to optimize test execution, such as parallel testing or prioritizing critical tests.** [.github/workflows/pr-merged.yaml [40-44]](https://github.com/kubescape/operator/pull/214/files#diff-d171229d8816dfbc2f3d1a5af7874334d947f2c2e531e575cc84216793d86b49R40-R44) ```diff -"vuln_scan", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_public_registry", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_public_registry_excluded", -"vuln_scan_trigger_scan_private_quay_registry", -"vuln_scan_triggering_with_cron_job", +"optimized_vuln_scan_suite", ``` |
Enabling\disabling automationWhen you first install the app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the improve tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] ``` meaning the `improve` tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically. |
Utilizing extra instructionsExtra instructions are very important for the `improve` tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
A note on code suggestions quality- While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. - Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. - Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the [custom suggestions :gem:](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/CUSTOM_SUGGESTIONS.md) tool - With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode. |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
User description
Overview
This PR fixes #
Signed Commits
Type
enhancement
Description
pr-merged.yaml
workflow to improve clarity and consistency.vulnerability_scanning
tovuln_scan
).Changes walkthrough
pr-merged.yaml
Streamline Vulnerability Scanning Test Identifiers
.github/workflows/pr-merged.yaml
and consistency.
checks.