Closed holtzermann17 closed 6 years ago
The text said that the type should be left implicit, but the notation preserved the type. This fixes it.
The proof goes through as expected!
example : ∃ x, x + 2 = 8 := begin let a := 3 * 2, existsi a, reflexivity end
The text said that the type should be left implicit, but the notation preserved the type. This fixes it.
The proof goes through as expected!