. -> , in cognacy field

[HedvigS]

I think that for the three forms below, the cognacy should contain a comma rather than a period to signify subcognacy/compound.

276-26_hair-5   164076  276 26_hair but-sek but-sek     (Chulo-hsien)   Ferrell69   1.65    false
1371-12_skin-1  318779  1371    12_skin huij    huij        skin    317042  1.96    false
1425-188_what-1 327001  1425    188_what    somo    somo            schlossberg2012 1.75    false

Here are the other members of 1, 65 for 26_hair

ID  Local_ID    Language_ID Parameter_ID    Value   Form    Segments    Comment Source  Cognacy Loan
405-26_hair-1   108575  405 26_hair buek    buek            Daroya-405-2006 1,65    false
416-26_hair-1   110798  416 26_hair bu'ʔuk  bu'ʔuk          136553  1,65    false
494-26_hair-1   130688  494 26_hair buek    buek        (final) (no glottal between in most subdialects)    Davis-494-2007  1,65    false
718-26_hair-1   184291  718 26_hair *buSék  *buSék          109780  1,65    false

1,96 for 12_skin

ID  Local_ID    Language_ID Parameter_ID    Value   Form    Segments    Comment Source  Cognacy Loan
57-12_skin-1    3984    57  12_skin wiriji  wiriji          GraceNB 1,96    false
1382-12_skin-1  319681  1382    12_skin geldu-n geldu-n     skin    317042  1,96    false
1386-12_skin-1  320109  1386    12_skin galaʔatjuː-m    galaʔatjuː-m        skin    317042  1,96    false
1388-12_skin-1  320317  1388    12_skin gulidjoˈi-  gulidjoˈi-      skin    317042  1,96    false

1,75 for 188_what

ID  Local_ID    Language_ID Parameter_ID    Value   Form    Segments    Comment Source  Cognacy Loan
1346-188_what-1 315887  1346    188_what    som som     what    LincolnND   1,75    false
1355-188_what-1 315590  1355    188_what    som som     what    LincolnND   1,75    false

[HedvigS]

Moved to email.