Closed xrotwang closed 3 years ago
Yes, @PhyloStar, if you can add a column "Order" to the languages.csv
, this would be very cool.
Three columns, actually:
None
for stuff like the "agglutinative non-indian languages")Sorry, so we would add (correct me, @xrotwang, if you disagree):
Family_in_Source
(or another suggestion?)SubGroup
(I use this in many datasets to indicate either known subgroups or subgroups mentioned in sources)sorry, was pasting at teh same time. We need Family/classification and subgroup, as they have two levels, right? E.g., Tibeto-Burman -> Tibetan, and Tibeto-Burman -> Himalayan
Okay. If we have classification string then we don't need "agglutinative non-indian languages" information, right...
The raw files do have the original number in the first column. https://github.com/lexibank/lsi/blob/master/raw/LSI_txt/1-21/10-11%20Five.txt
Order would be based on sequence of appearance in the pdf. Okay. I think I will add this.
@PhyloStar, expand this line here:
In this way:
@attr.s
class CustomLanguage(Language):
NameInSource = attr.ib(default=None)
Order = attr.ib(default=None)
Classification = attr.ib(default=None)
SubGroup = attr.ib(default=None)
This will then be available, and you can add the information, if you add these fields (Order, etc.) also to the languages.tsv
I am uploading a version of the languages.txt file (a tab separated file). Does it look like what was discussed in the thread? languages.txt
yes, perfect! I'll integrate it in the repos.
I think it would be nice if we had the number and order (and classification, e.g. "AGGLUTINATIVE NON-INDIAN LANGUAGES") of languages as they appear in the book in https://github.com/lexibank/lsi/blob/master/etc/languages.tsv This might require making up numbers for some languages, but would be useful to provide a good comparison of our data and the scans (like for TPPSR)