lexibank / lsi

CLDF dataset derived from Grierson's "Linguistic Survey of India" from 1928
https://lsi.clld.org
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
1 stars 0 forks source link

List of rare symbols #7

Open PhyloStar opened 4 years ago

PhyloStar commented 4 years ago

It is not clear if some symbols are present or just a typo. I noticed that some of them are typos. Here is my output for tonight.

Palatal sound here in general mean a stop. May be not an affricate. Ch tɕ Ch’ tɕʰ

H h #H occuring as a capital in the item in Korean

à͛ à͛/a (as in German Mann)

a ʌ (a in America or u in hurry)

b’ bʰ (weak aspiration represented by ’. Should be use breathy voiced or just aspiration?) ḍ’ ɖʰ

n n̪ (not clear if this should be a dental sound. Tamil has an alveolar stop. In general dental nasal stops are present in Indian languages)

ṅ̇ ṅ̇/n (Typo in the data. Should be treated as velar nasal ŋ)

° + (Should be a glottal check according the book. ˤ)

ꭓ́ χ (kkh according to the book)

s̄ s̄/s (Typo in case of Anal, Bhojpuri) š́ š́/ʃ

t̤ t̤/t

ḅ ḅ/b (A peculiar labial according to Grierson, unvoiced may be) ḇ ḇ/b (Another variety of sound. Occurs in Tailang) ḥ ḥ/h (A sound equivalent to visarga in Sanskrit. Essentially h)

ṟ ṟ/r (Trilled r)

= + (Slightly higher tone than a mid level in Pwo and Sga Karen language)

š́ š́/ʃ (skh in Ormuri) ṣ̌ ṣ̌/ʂ (sch in Ormuri)

s̱ s̱/s (sˤ Occurs in Arabic)

v ʋ (typically common in Indian languages. Alternates between v and w)

LinguList commented 4 years ago

Palatal sound here in general mean a stop. May be not an affricate. Ch tɕ Ch’ tɕʰ

I am not sure, but I think that Grierson follows Indian tradition, where palatal sounds are usually pronounced as affricates. But not, as I suggested, as alveolo-palatal affricates, but rather as tʃ. So I sould propose to change all instances accordingly. But I'd keep the affricates, as pure palatal sounds are very rare, and I do not think they are attested in those regions, they always have an affricate element. Once we have phoneme inventories, we can compare individual languages, this will come in handy.

LinguList commented 4 years ago

= + (Slightly higher tone than a mid level in Pwo and Sga Karen language)

Oh, this needs to be ignored than, or writen as a tone, i.e., ⁴⁴. I thought it was a morpheme boundary marker, therefore the +.

LinguList commented 4 years ago

@PhyloStar, can you apply some modifications and make an official PR (you make a branch with git branch XXX then check it out git checkout XXX, etc.), so I can see all changes and we can discuss them? This would help a lot.

PhyloStar commented 4 years ago

@LinguList I pushed a branch here: https://github.com/lexibank/lsi/blob/discOrtho/etc/orthography.tsv

The third column shows my comments. I am looking at dipthongs and vowels. The notation changes across languages and not straightforward. I will try to push something in the evening again.

LinguList commented 4 years ago

okay, thanks, remind me if I forget to look into this, I'll be on partial holidays over Easter.

PhyloStar commented 4 years ago

Okay. Strange. I didn't get your message as notification. Happy Easter!

PhyloStar commented 4 years ago

Can you once look into the orthography profile here? https://github.com/lexibank/lsi/blob/discOrtho/etc/orthography.tsv

LinguList commented 4 years ago

Nice. I suppose you make direct decisions also against the things I proposed there, and make a PR, so we can contrast the differences? And then we discuss quickly, merge, and we're done.

PhyloStar commented 4 years ago

@LinguList I did as you suggested. Made changes to the context free mapping upto line 318. Once we agree then, I can modify the context dependent ones in the later lines.