Closed lagleki closed 9 years ago
Table 9.3 doesn't follow the convention above.
This convention makes English glossing wide and thus taking a lot of space. Consider changing to Lojban is bold, Glossing is italic or normal.
This is what we're doing; if there's a further action item here I don't see it.
mostly any Lojban text should be wrapped in a certain tag and a single css style is to be applied to this text throughout the whole CLL.
To the best of my knowledge this is, in fact, the case, except for in the section-start tables where it seemed like italics would just be kind of silly (since it's obvious what's Lojban in that case).
2015-09-28 11:11 GMT+03:00 rlpowell notifications@github.com:
To the best of my knowledge this is, in fact, the case
depends. E.g. section 1.11 starts with The following cmavo are discussed in this section: ce'u KOhA abstraction focus
and ce'u isn't in italic.
, except for in the section-start tables where it seemed like italics would
just be kind of silly (since it's obvious what's Lojban in that case).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/lojban/cll/issues/159#issuecomment-143668620.
Yes, that's exactly what I said; re-read my comment, please. If you feel that such tables should also be italicized, say so and why.
Let's use http://vrici.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/public/cll_prince_2015-08-31.pdf as the reference.
Example 2.18 Lojban: italic, emphasis: bold Glossing: bold English: normal roman
Within English text Lojban text is usually italic.
This indeed looks like there is some formalization. Any other ideas?