Open Wuzzy2 opened 3 years ago
I consider this to be an actual bug. I like to note the CLL also has a clear contradiction in the rafsi chapter 4.6:
Every gismu has from two to five rafsi, each of a different form, but each such rafsi represents only one gismu. (…) Each gismu always has at least two rafsi forms; one is the gismu itself (used only at the end of a lujvo), and one is the gismu with out its final vowel (used only at the beginning or middle of a lujvo).
This is a contradiction. Let me summarize:
Claim 1: Every gismu has a 4-letter rafsi Claim 2: Every such rafsi represents only one gismu Claim 3: “broda”, “brode”, “brodi”, “brodo”, “brodu” are gismu
So this means that “broda”, “brode”, “brodi”, “brodo”, “brodu” must all have the 4-letter rafsi “brod”. But then this rafsi can't represent only one gismu at the same time. That's a logical contradiction.
Possible solutions:
Which do you prefer
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 20:24 Wuzzy notifications@github.com wrote:
I consider this to be an actual bug. I like to note the CLL also has a clear contradiction in the rafsi chapter 4.6:
Every gismu has from two to five rafsi, each of a different form, but each such rafsi represents only one gismu. (…) Each gismu always has at least two rafsi forms; one is the gismu itself (used only at the end of a lujvo), and one is the gismu with out its final vowel (used only at the beginning or middle of a lujvo).
This is a contradiction. Let me summarize:
Claim 1: Every gismu has a 4-letter rafsi Claim 2: Every such rafsi represents only one gismu Claim 3: “broda”, “brode”, “brodi”, “brodo”, “brodu” are gismu
So this means that “broda”, “brode”, “brodi”, “brodo”, “brodu” must all have the 4-letter rafsi “brod”. But then this rafsi can't represent only one gismu at the same time. That's a logical contradiction.
Possible solutions:
- Explicitly assign the “brod” rafsi to one of the 5 gismu. This implies that 4 of the 5 gismu won't have a 4-letter rafsi
- Remove the “brod” rafsi entirely. This implies that none of these 5 gismu will have a 4-letter rafsi
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/lojban/cll/issues/445#issuecomment-791564299, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASNCEJVK3BY43UBMC6JPP3TCEHU3ANCNFSM4YVQV3HQ .
Personally, I prefer assigning “brod” to “broda”, leaving the other 4 gismu without a 4-letter rafsi.
However, I STRONGLY suggest to discuss this with other Lojbanists first, before doing any changes.
Here's a different solution that I just thought of: Assign “brod” to “brodi”, so that “brodi” can be used in the middle of the word as well. This is slightly more balanced as well.
Summary:
Theoretical rafsi list:
The “brod” rafsi is could stand for any of the 5 rafsi (see explanation above). That's kinda meh.
Rafsi list:
Only broda and brode can be used in the middle of a lujvo. Also, the “brod” rafsi is probably already used in the wild, so it is probably not a good idea to remove it.
Rafsi list:
Only broda and brode can be used in the middle of a lujvo. Considering that broda already has a short rafsi which allows to use this word in the middle of a lujvo, it doesn't seem that useful to give it another rafsi.
Rafsi list:
broda, brode and brodi can be used in the middle of a lujvo. This solution seems now the most balanced to me, and is now my new preferred solution.
I agree with assigning "-brod-" to "brodi". I guess that "broda" is the most frequently used and "brodu" the least. I use "rodbo'e" (along with "comdaidza") for "thingamajig".
The CLL leaves a couple of questions open that I like to have clarified in the CLL: