Open mattfbacon opened 2 years ago
Interestingly, this appears to have been corrected for example 14.152. Maybe whoever corrected that forgot to correct 18.118 as well.
Yep. https://github.com/lojban/cll/blame/c685400d2a0b7b4497400910f5354bc2f3fc01c3/chapters/14.xml#L2973 links to https://mw.lojban.org/papri/CLL,_aka_Reference_Grammar,_Errata which lists the chapter 14 erratum but not the identical one in chapter 18.
Example 18.118 says
li re ge su'i gi pi'i re du li vo
.This is wrong. In none of the official YACC grammar, Camxes, and Ilmentufa does this parse. To make a forethought connection of operators, a guhek should be used, not a gek.
A corrected example would use a guhek:
li re gu'e su'i gi pi'i re du li vo
.