Closed lutteropp closed 5 years ago
We sometimes get something like this, for example in the m2 dataset:
Hypothetical best-case taxon usages if we wouldn't care about overlaps and stuff like this: SE001: 65.8872 % SE002: 74.6037 % SE003: 580.259 % SE004: 149.343 % SE005: 286.655 % SE006: 534.967 % SE007: 629.693 % SE008: 274.705 % SE009: 861.429 % SE010: 530.466 % SE011: 406.939 % SE012: 817.361 % SE013: 665.242 % SE014: 711.325 % SE015: 735.772 % SE016: 512.475 % SE017: 722.159 % SE018: 853.066 % SE019: 839.111 % SE020: 64.1098 %
Percentage of reconstructed sequence data per taxon: SE001: 8.1907 % SE002: 11.0295 % SE003: 76.9159 % SE004: 27.1511 % SE005: 51.8601 % SE006: 74.3381 % SE007: 81.0818 % SE008: 50.1152 % SE009: 91.2277 % SE010: 74.3992 % SE011: 63.8208 % SE012: 87.8972 % SE013: 81.9521 % SE014: 84.4996 % SE015: 84.9001 % SE016: 74.0937 % SE017: 85.4795 % SE018: 90.9021 % SE019: 90.408 % SE020: 7.72766 %
This means, some taxa appear in way more blocks than others!
closed because we probably can't do much about this
We sometimes get something like this, for example in the m2 dataset:
Hypothetical best-case taxon usages if we wouldn't care about overlaps and stuff like this: SE001: 65.8872 % SE002: 74.6037 % SE003: 580.259 % SE004: 149.343 % SE005: 286.655 % SE006: 534.967 % SE007: 629.693 % SE008: 274.705 % SE009: 861.429 % SE010: 530.466 % SE011: 406.939 % SE012: 817.361 % SE013: 665.242 % SE014: 711.325 % SE015: 735.772 % SE016: 512.475 % SE017: 722.159 % SE018: 853.066 % SE019: 839.111 % SE020: 64.1098 %
Percentage of reconstructed sequence data per taxon: SE001: 8.1907 % SE002: 11.0295 % SE003: 76.9159 % SE004: 27.1511 % SE005: 51.8601 % SE006: 74.3381 % SE007: 81.0818 % SE008: 50.1152 % SE009: 91.2277 % SE010: 74.3992 % SE011: 63.8208 % SE012: 87.8972 % SE013: 81.9521 % SE014: 84.4996 % SE015: 84.9001 % SE016: 74.0937 % SE017: 85.4795 % SE018: 90.9021 % SE019: 90.408 % SE020: 7.72766 %