Closed snake14 closed 3 months ago
@snake14 This works as expected and I thought it should have worked with earlier code also, do you think this is a bug or regression?
@AltamashShaikh I'm not sure if it ever worked or not. I suppose it could potentially be a regression in the way FieldConfig evaluates conditions. However, I couldn't find any other examples of fields that used !=
in the condition.
Description:
It was noticed that the in-page app ID field, for the Shareaholic tag, was always hidden. This PR fixes that.
Review