RBQL can now handle a.good_alphanumeric_column_name and a["arbitrary column name!"] notation (see #6 ).
But it would be great to go further and support direct column variables like name, surname, price etc without a and b prefixes.
It is not clear yet if it is possible at all to handle raw column names reliably and transparently. The most obvious problem is a potential conflict between column names and Python/JS identifiers, e.g. columns named class, if, sys, function, etc.
RBQL can now handle
a.good_alphanumeric_column_nameanda["arbitrary column name!"]notation (see #6 ). But it would be great to go further and support direct column variables likename,surname,priceetc withoutaandbprefixes. It is not clear yet if it is possible at all to handle raw column names reliably and transparently. The most obvious problem is a potential conflict between column names and Python/JS identifiers, e.g. columns namedclass,if,sys,function, etc.