metanorma / bipm-si-brochure

SI Brochure edition 9, semantic encoded version (WARNING: DRAFT)
3 stars 0 forks source link

Update SI Brochure references to outcomes #212

Closed ronaldtse closed 1 year ago

ronaldtse commented 1 year ago

In the SI Brochure, there are only a few references to outcomes (CR, PV, Recommendation/Resolutions) in the body (not in the resolutions).

As approved by Michael Stock of the BIPM, we will update these references:

2.3.1 “The Kelvin”:

Screen Shot 2023-02-07 at 2 55 30 PM

To: "adopted in CIPM Recommendation 5 (1989)" https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/78-1989/resolution-5

Table 4:

Screen Shot 2023-02-07 at 2 56 25 PM

To: "See CIPM Recommendation 2 (2002) on the use of the sievert." https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/91-2002/resolution-2

Table 8:

Screen Shot 2023-02-07 at 2 56 49 PM

To: "adopted in CIPM Resolution (1879)." https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/4-1879/resolution-

Table 8:

Screen Shot 2023-02-07 at 2 57 05 PM

To: "adopted in CIPM Resolution (1879)." https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/4-1879/resolution-

To: "adopted in CGPM Resolution 6 (1979)" https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/16-1979/resolution-6

Table 8:

Screen Shot 2023-02-07 at 2 57 12 PM

To: "adopted in CIPM Resolution (1879)." https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/4-1879/resolution-

5.2:

Screen Shot 2023-02-07 at 2 57 47 PM

To: "adopted in CGPM Resolution 6 (1979)" https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/16-1979/resolution-6

Originally posted by @ronaldtse in https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-si-brochure/issues/193#issuecomment-1425261816

ronaldtse commented 1 year ago

Further, Janet Miles of BIPM indicated to perform the following:

For information, in 1879 the text was presented as a “Resolution” and then adopted by the CIPM. So in my opinion Resolution is a fair description and is what we’ve used on the BIPM website.

You’ll see that in each URL there’s a part “/en/” that points explicitly to the English page. This can be replaced by “/fr/” to point explicitly to the corresponding French page, or left out altogether to default to the user’s browser settings… I think it’s probably best to include the “/en/” and “/fr/” in the English and French links respectively, as in due course they will have different DOIs.

ronaldtse commented 1 year ago

We are blocked by: