This is from JIS Z 8301 at the mn-samples-jis repository.
We take the two examples:
JIS B 0001, 機械製図
vs
JIS P 0138, 日本製紙連合会. 紙加工仕上寸法. 有効です. 日本製紙連合会. 入手先: https://webdesk.jsa.or.jp/books/W11M0090/index/?bunsyo_id=JIS+P+0138%3A1998
The log is identical:
[relaton-jis] INFO: (JIS B 0001) Fetching from webdesk.jsa.or.jp ...
...
[relaton-jis] INFO: (JIS B 0001) Found: `JIS B 0001`
...
[relaton-jis] INFO: (JIS P 0138) Fetching from webdesk.jsa.or.jp ...
...
[relaton-jis] INFO: (JIS P 0138) Found: `JIS P 0138`
In Relaton, the source is available for both identically:
bundle exec relaton fetch 'JIS P 0138'
<bibdata type="standard" schema-version="v1.2.9">
<fetched>2024-10-17</fetched>
<title format="text/plain" language="ja" script="Jpan">紙加工仕上寸法</title>
<title format="text/plain" language="en" script="Lant">Writing paper and certain classes of printed matter -- Trimmed sizes -- A and B series</title>
<uri type="src">https://webdesk.jsa.or.jp/books/W11M0090/index/?bunsyo_id=JIS+P+0138%3A1998</uri>
<docidentifier type="JIS" primary="true">JIS P 0138</docidentifier>
<docnumber>P0138</docnumber>
Hence I'm not sure why the treatment in the document is different.
The bibliography entries are encoded as:
* [[[JIS_B_0001,JIS B 0001]]], 機械製図
...
* [[[JIS_P_0138,JIS P 0138]]], 紙加工仕上寸法
From
This is from JIS Z 8301 at the mn-samples-jis repository.
We take the two examples:
vs
The log is identical:
In Relaton, the source is available for both identically:
Hence I'm not sure why the treatment in the document is different.
The bibliography entries are encoded as: