Open sgf opened 2 years ago
<Window x:Class="WpfApp1.MainWindow" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008" xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:local="clr-namespace:WpfApp1" mc:Ignorable="d" Title="MainWindow" Height="450" Width="800"> <Grid> </Grid> </Window>
this is a wpf new mainwindow. u can see many xmlns. This is very confusing, I am using wpf, why do I specify so many urls (xmlns).
<lib>mswpf,more...<lib/> <Window Title="MainWindow" Height="450" Width="800"> </Window>
I think the design of xaml is full of configuration items (xmlns, x:Class, mc:Ignorable). And many of these things should have been replaced by conventions.
xaml‘s Style is very Poor readability. Compared to the CSS a lot worse.
this is a wpf new mainwindow. u can see many xmlns. This is very confusing, I am using wpf, why do I specify so many urls (xmlns).
I think the design of xaml is full of configuration items (xmlns, x:Class, mc:Ignorable). And many of these things should have been replaced by conventions.