Open lynnssi opened 3 months ago
Hi @lynnssi , may I ask that in what scenario would you need to use a vector database without requiring a vector field? Milvus is a vector database and it's python sdk always check the vector field. So we add this check in milvus server side recently.
I have the same issue. Reason is simple, I have duplicate metadata that I do not want to flatten/denormalized into the table, which makes it very redundant.
(It's bit like relational db. I know milvus is not meant for that, but I wouldn't want to put meta data in yet another RDBMS, which simplified increase our tech stack complexity.)
BTW, this is a breaking change to our techstack. To avoid reimplementing the workflow, I'm gonna add a dummy vector field and bypass for now.
Milvus is not designed for this. Even though milvus will support "data in data out " feature soon, where vector field is not required any more, we still expect data to be embedded into a vector field.
Also, Milvus won't support any operation like Join so store meta into multiple collection should not be a solution
Is there an existing issue for this?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In Milvus 2.4.1, I am able to create collections that do not have a vector field in the schema. When I upgraded to 2.4.4, I encountered the error
RPC error: [create_collection], <MilvusException: (code=1100, message=schema does not contain vector field: invalid parameter)>
.I would like to be able to use this functionality of vector-less collections in future versions of Milvus
Example code
Describe the solution you'd like.
I would like to be able to create, insert into, and query collections that do not have a vector field in future versions of Milvus. This is very useful for the development of search applications.
Describe an alternate solution.
No response
Anything else? (Additional Context)
No response