Closed HybridDog closed 7 years ago
I too am positive to this change for the reason you mention. However, I've tried to write the mod as a drop-in replacement of the original. This would break that. But maybe it's time to let go of the past and build the best possible mod according to best practices, of which this issue highlights one.
I'm for it but, and this should go for development of the mod in general, let's create a development
or next
branch for these additions or feature branches for larger ones, for the time being.
Your settingtypes.txt
is one of the few examples I've seen using the xx.yy_zz
convention whereas all other mods I've seen uses xx_yy_zz
for setting vars. Who's right? :)
l think using modname.setting_name
looks better than modname_setting_name
.
This would break that.
The original mod didn't have settings (except that strange item deletion setting) and doesn't work on current minetest.
What about modname:setting
?
To avoid conflicts without other mods, l think the settings should get the "item_drop." prefix. l do this with my mods and it works well https://github.com/HybridDog/sumpf/blob/master/sumpf/settingtypes.txt. Do you approve adding this prefix?