Closed be-marc closed 3 years ago
Two points to consider w.r.t inner_tuning_result()
:
get_inner_tuning_result()
or extract_tuning_extract()
(something that starts with a verb) be a better name?would get_inner_tuning_result() or extract_tuning_extract() (something that starts with a verb) be a better name?
Yes and without the word tuning since nested resampling can be also used for feature selection. extract_inner_result()
? But maybe it will be easier to just implement another function in mlr3fselect.
Should this be a S3 generic with methods for ResampleResult and BenchmarkResult?
In case of a BenchmarkResult
the function would return a data.table
with an extra column indicating the experiment?
BenchmarkResult
withArchiveTuning
methods viai
-th evaluation oruhash
inner_tuning_results
function.