internal: add compile conds into packages.json for ide

From the provided git diff output, there are several notable changes and potential issues that can be identified across different files and contexts. Here are the top three observations based on the provided diff and context:

1. Backend Filtering Changes

The function backend_filter is being modified to accept an IndexMap<PathBuf, CompileCondition> instead of a Vec<PathBuf>. This change suggests a significant restructuring of how file conditions are managed and filtered based on compilation conditions.

Potential Issue:

The conversion from CondExpr to CompileCondition might introduce complexity and potential bugs, especially if the mapping between conditions and files is not handled correctly.
The use of HashSet for backend and optlevel in CompileCondition can lead to unpredictable orderings, which might affect reproducibility and consistency in builds.

Suggestion:

Ensure thorough testing to verify that the new filtering logic correctly applies the compilation conditions to the files.
Consider using a more deterministic collection (like BTreeSet) if the order is critical for certain stages of the build process.

2. Test File Handling

There are modifications to how test files are handled, particularly in the generation of test drivers and the inclusion of test files in packages.

Potential Issue:

The removal of js_only_test.mbt and changes in the handling of js_or_wasm.mbt might affect the functionality of existing tests, especially if these files were conditionally compiled for specific targets.
The absence of newlines at the end of some test files (\ No newline at end of file) might cause issues with certain tools or parsers that expect a standard file format.

Suggestion:

Verify that the changes to test file handling do not inadvertently disable or alter the behavior of tests intended for specific compilation targets.
Ensure that all files, especially those containing tests, adhere to standard formatting practices to avoid potential parsing issues.

3. Access Control and Visibility

The changes to the mod.rs file indicate adjustments in how packages and their files are exposed or hidden from other packages.

Potential Issue:

The introduction of pub(readonly) types and the adjustment of visibility modifiers (pub, priv) might lead to unintended access control issues if not properly documented or communicated within the development team.
Misuse or misunderstanding of these modifiers could result in runtime errors or security vulnerabilities.

Suggestion:

Clearly document the new access control rules and their implications for package visibility.
Provide guidelines or automated checks to ensure that developers are aware of and adhere to the new visibility constraints.

Conclusion

These observations highlight key areas of concern related to backend filtering, test file handling, and access control within the codebase. Thorough testing and documentation updates are recommended to mitigate potential issues and ensure smooth integration of the changes.

moonbitlang / moon