Create copy for > 13 review page

[threeqube]

[emgollie]

My understanding is that the mentor options at point of review are the same for < 13 (https://github.com/mozilla/aestimia/issues/46) and > 13 except for the drop down feedback fields, but let me know if I'm missing something. Also, @threeqube: at the bottom does there need to be an issue/deny issuance selection (so the badge is either awarded or not)?

cc @edrushka

Review [Earner Name]'s Badge Application

[Earner Name] would like you to review their materials in pursuit of the [Badge Name] Badge. Review the evidence they've uploaded and an optional reflection, then mark your decision below.

[Earner Name]'s Evidence

[Earner Name]'s Reflection

Check all criteria [Earner Name] has met for this badge At least three are required: (@threeqube, is this still accurate?) [Checkboxes based on criteria]

Add your feedback and suggestions [Character limit?]

Submit button

[threeqube]

My understanding is that the mentor options at point of review are the same for < 13 (#46) and > 13 except for the drop down feedback fields, but let me know if I'm missing something.

You're not missing anything. That is correct that this page is mostly the same aside from free form text field for > 13 learners vs. dropdown fields for < 13 learners.

@threeqube: at the bottom does there need to be an issue/deny issuance selection (so the badge is either awarded or not)?

We should double check with @iamjessklein and @chloeatplay but my understanding is that the required criteria will be notated. If the mentor does not mark off all the required fields, then the badge will not be awarded. If the mentor marks off all required fields, then the badge will be awarded.

At least three are required: (@threeqube, is this still accurate?)

As per above, this is not accurate.

[emgollie]

@iamjessklein @chloeatplay per your thoughts, we may want to add a line of copy explaining the importance of marking appropriate criteria so the badge issuance can happen. Thanks all.

[threeqube]

Yes we should.

[chloeatplay]

@emgollie @threeqube correct the the required criteria will be notated. We don't need to add an extra step to the UX - if the badge assessor doesn't check the required criteria the badge is not awarded. A line explaining that is included in the above mockup, does the copy "Check what applies to the work above (needs required to get the badge) " sound good to you?

[emgollie]

Got it, thanks @chloeatplay. On https://github.com/mozilla/aestimia/issues/46#issuecomment-18589144 we've got:

The badge will only be awarded if you check all required criteria.

[emgollie]

Final copy for > 13 review page:

Review [Earner Name]'s Badge Application

[Earner Name] would like you to review their materials in pursuit of the [Badge Name] Badge. Review the evidence they've uploaded and an optional reflection, then mark your decision and feedback below.

[Earner Name]'s Evidence

[Earner Name]'s Reflection

Check all criteria [Earner Name] has met for this badge The badge will only be awarded if you check all required criteria. [Criteria checkboxes]

Add your feedback and suggestions [Character limit?]

Submit button

[threeqube]

:+1:

[iamjessklein]

:+1:

[chloeatplay]

:dancer: