Six sites don't seem to have the higher-res assets:
dailymail
dailybeast
images.google
jcpenney
verizonwireless
wikia
1563 passing (481ms)
6 failing
1) images/ should have an image with the correct width and height for dailymail:
AssertionError: width: expected 64 to equal 128
at Context.it (test/image-sizes.test.js:46:14)
2) images/ should have an image with the correct width and height for dailybeast:
AssertionError: width: expected 64 to equal 128
at Context.it (test/image-sizes.test.js:46:14)
3) images/ should have an image with the correct width and height for images.google:
AssertionError: width: expected 64 to equal 128
at Context.it (test/image-sizes.test.js:46:14)
4) images/ should have an image with the correct width and height for jcpenney:
AssertionError: width: expected 64 to equal 128
at Context.it (test/image-sizes.test.js:46:14)
5) images/ should have an image with the correct width and height for verizonwireless:
AssertionError: width: expected 106 to equal 128
at Context.it (test/image-sizes.test.js:46:14)
6) images/ should have an image with the correct width and height for wikia:
AssertionError: width: expected 64 to equal 128
at Context.it (test/image-sizes.test.js:46:14)
Steps to reproduce:
npm test
in this repo.Actual results:
Six sites don't seem to have the higher-res assets: