msarilar / EDEngineer

An overlay to track Elite Dangerous blueprints progress in real time
MIT License
504 stars 173 forks source link

Wrong max count in Antimony #584

Closed kerbe closed 1 year ago

kerbe commented 3 years ago

As I was gathering materials, noticed that EDEngineer and in game inventory has different maximum for Antimony:

image

Also noticed that grade seems to be different, in game it looks to be T5 material, EDEngineer shows grade 4. Haven't checked material trader how it shows it.

Scyntrus commented 3 years ago

Antimony has a limit of 150 for me. Ruthenium also has a limit of 150 for me, but EDEngineer says the limit is 100. But Tellerium's limit is actually 100.

Scyntrus commented 3 years ago

image

kerbe commented 3 years ago

Now that I got notification of these messages, I checked my game again. Currently it seems to have:

@Scyntrus, that Rutherium limit of 100 is because of issue #581, as it was showing like that a while ago.

Antimony limit was 100 for few weeks, before I made this issue. Now it seems to have changed... No idea what has caused that. Update from Fdev, or some other anomaly. Don't know. But a bit annoying.

Scyntrus commented 3 years ago

So I just checked again and my Tellerium limit changed from 100 to 150. I don't know what happened.

Lorithus commented 3 years ago

It's an Elite Dangerous bug, when you reach the limit of 100, logout and login, so the limit will be 150.

seedubya commented 1 year ago

Antimony / Tellurium all report 150 now. Ruthenium limit was resolved by #720

kerbe commented 1 year ago

Closing this issue, as it might mislead people while open.

There is Elite Dangerous client bug, that when you have character who hasn't collected certain materials ever before, and you get first time those mats, it shows you limit of 100. But once you restart your client, it shows correct amount of 150.

So whoever comes here looking for reason why your client shows different amount of max materials than EDEngineer, first relogin, and check again. If it still shows wrong, then it is worth opening new issue.