nc-minibbs / mbbs

A repository for the Mini-Bird Breeding Survey data
https://minibbs.us
Other
2 stars 0 forks source link

Handling cases of `X` Counts #14

Closed bsaul closed 2 years ago

bsaul commented 2 years ago

@ahhurlbert: any thoughts on how should we handle the few cases where the count is X:

sub_id       date                    observers            common_name count
1  S8347869 2011-05-22                         <NA>                Mallard     X
2 S10953436 2012-06-10 Norman Budnitz, Mike Schultz      Northern Bobwhite     X
3 S10953436 2012-06-10 Norman Budnitz, Mike Schultz Eastern Whip-poor-will     X
4  S8347869 2011-05-22                         <NA>       Eastern Kingbird     X
5 S10953436 2012-06-10 Norman Budnitz, Mike Schultz       Kentucky Warbler     X
6  S6552240 2010-06-17                         <NA>        Prairie Warbler     X

From ebird help:

Counting individual birds provides incredibly valuable data for understanding bird populations. Putting “X” only tells us the species was present - but there could be anywhere from 1 to 1,000,000! If you’re studying bird populations, knowing whether there were 40 or 40,000 individuals makes all the difference. Provide exact counts when you can, and your closest estimate when you can't.

ahhurlbert commented 2 years ago

I suggest scoring them all as 1, and adding a comment. If all other species on the checklist have a count, one possibility is some may have used X to denote something like "detected between stops or outside of the 3-minute window" or something like that. We could also email Norm and Mike and ask if they recall.

bsaul commented 2 years ago

👍🏼 . Sounds good. I'm creating a count_raw field to store the original values too.