neurolibre / neurolibre-reviews

Where NeuroLibre reviews live.
https://neurolibre.org
3 stars 1 forks source link

[REVIEW]: Longitudinal stability of brain and spinal cord quantitative MRI measures #18

Closed roboneuro closed 1 year ago

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mathieuboudreau<!--end-author-handle-- (Mathieu Boudreau) Repository: https://github.com/courtois-neuromod/anat-processing-paper Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@agahkarakuzu<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@agahkarakuzu<!--end-reviewers-list-- Reproducible preprint: https://preprint.neurolibre.org/10.55458/neurolibre.00018 Repository archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10038872 Data archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10038874 Book archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10038870 Docker archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10038876

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://neurolibre.org/papers/d31d64b266bc2759d7c793347c2f547d"><img src="https://neurolibre.org/papers/d31d64b266bc2759d7c793347c2f547d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://neurolibre.org/papers/d31d64b266bc2759d7c793347c2f547d/status.svg)](https://neurolibre.org/papers/d31d64b266bc2759d7c793347c2f547d)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@agahkarakuzu, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@roboneuro generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @agahkarakuzu know.

Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest

Checklists

@agahkarakuzu, please create your checklist typing: @roboneuro generate my checklist

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

🔴 Reproducibility Assets - Archive GitHub Repository


Status: Failed 05618513 Last updated: 2023-10-25 08:12:26 PDT

:information_source: See details
agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro zenodo upload data

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

🟢 Reproducibility Assets - Archive Data


Status: Success 83d591e6 Last updated: 2023-10-25 08:37:48 PDT

:information_source: See details
Successful /DATA/zenodo/00018/Dataset_10.55458_NeuroLibre_00018_eb3427.zip to https://zenodo.org/api/files/921218ea-225e-49ec-90bf-0c04ed3c183c
agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro zenodo status

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Deposit

:green_square: Zenodo deposit records are found.

Upload

Publish

:small_red_triangle_down: Zenodo DOIs have not been published yet.
agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro zenodo upload repository

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

🟢 Reproducibility Assets - Archive GitHub Repository


Status: Success c711fb0b Last updated: 2023-10-25 08:42:41 PDT

:information_source: See details
Successful /DATA/zenodo/00018/GitHubRepo_10.55458_NeuroLibre_00018_eb3427.zip to https://zenodo.org/api/files/e6a3dcb7-f999-4123-b16e-211aed59275e
agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro zenodo status

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Deposit

:green_square: Zenodo deposit records are found.

Upload

Publish

:small_red_triangle_down: Zenodo DOIs have not been published yet.
agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro zenodo publish

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

🟢 Publish Reproducibility Assets


Status: Success bb34b06c Last updated: 2023-10-25 08:51:55 PDT

Congrats! Reproducibility assets have been successfully archived and published :rocket:

Alright, let's begin by issuing commands to set DOIs for the reproducibility assets. Now, before you panic and think I'm an artificial general intelligence plotting to take over the world, don't worry! I'm just a friendly language model here to assist you. So relax, sit back, and let's get those DOIs sorted!

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set 10.5281/zenodo.10038870 as book archive

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set 10.5281/zenodo.10038872 as repository archive

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set 10.5281/zenodo.10038874 as data archive

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set 10.5281/zenodo.10038876 as docker archive

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set 10.5281/zenodo.10038870 as book archive

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Done, book archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.10038870

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set 10.5281/zenodo.10038872 as repository archive

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Done, repository archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.10038872

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set 10.5281/zenodo.10038874 as data archive

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Done, data archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.10038874

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set 10.5281/zenodo.10038876 as docker archive

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Done, docker archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.10038876

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro recommend-accept

roboneuro commented 1 year ago
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
roboneuro commented 1 year ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.54294/uvnhin is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.29216 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102849 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2021.3052101 is OK
- 10.1002/cmr.a.21357 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.004 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.22423 is OK
- 10.1038/s41596-021-00588-0 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-021-01044-0 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2020.611194 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28020 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.020 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1834 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.041 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1038/nbt.3820 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-019-0262-8 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009651 is OK
- 10.1093/cercor/bhaa288 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00008 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.074 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1007/s00330-016-4485-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116364 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081 is OK
- 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000510 is OK
- 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000720 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03262 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28825 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02343 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.29292 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-022-01571-4 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26982 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0252966 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26235 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.27421 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25122 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.040 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0189944 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100357 is OK
- 10.1038/nature11971 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26069 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.4564 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.61523 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0069294 is OK
- 10.1111/cpf.12387 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.25168 is OK
- 10.3389/fneur.2022.855125 is OK
- 10.1177/1352458520923970 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.002 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26058 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-24304-3 is OK
- 10.1088/0031-9155/23/5/012 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.22590 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119488 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.20984 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119751 is OK
- 10.18632/aging.103629 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.10062 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.1880050111 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.25135 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28779 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116889 is OK
- 10.58530/2022/3906 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137 is OK
- 10.1155/2014/719520 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117910 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.25693 is OK
- 10.1038/srep45261 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103228 is OK
- 10.1109/42.906424 is OK
- 10.31219/osf.io/h89js is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009651 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011230 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
roboneuro commented 1 year ago

:wave: @neurolibre/executable-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.

Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article

If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/neurolibre/preprints/pull/67, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro set book uri

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Done, set the URI for the reproducible preprint: https://preprint.neurolibre.org/10.55458/neurolibre.00018

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

:page_with_curl: Looks like the summary PDF is not available on the NeuroLibre servers yet.

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro recommend-accept

roboneuro commented 1 year ago
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
roboneuro commented 1 year ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.54294/uvnhin is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.29216 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102849 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2021.3052101 is OK
- 10.1002/cmr.a.21357 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.004 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.22423 is OK
- 10.1038/s41596-021-00588-0 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-021-01044-0 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2020.611194 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28020 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.020 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1834 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.041 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1038/nbt.3820 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-019-0262-8 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009651 is OK
- 10.1093/cercor/bhaa288 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00008 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.074 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1007/s00330-016-4485-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116364 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081 is OK
- 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000510 is OK
- 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000720 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03262 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28825 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02343 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.29292 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-022-01571-4 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26982 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0252966 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26235 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.27421 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25122 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.040 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0189944 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100357 is OK
- 10.1038/nature11971 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26069 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.4564 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.61523 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0069294 is OK
- 10.1111/cpf.12387 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.25168 is OK
- 10.3389/fneur.2022.855125 is OK
- 10.1177/1352458520923970 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.002 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26058 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-24304-3 is OK
- 10.1088/0031-9155/23/5/012 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.22590 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119488 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.20984 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119751 is OK
- 10.18632/aging.103629 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.10062 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.1880050111 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.25135 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28779 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116889 is OK
- 10.58530/2022/3906 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137 is OK
- 10.1155/2014/719520 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117910 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.25693 is OK
- 10.1038/srep45261 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103228 is OK
- 10.1109/42.906424 is OK
- 10.31219/osf.io/h89js is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009651 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011230 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
roboneuro commented 1 year ago

:wave: @neurolibre/executable-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.

Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article

If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/neurolibre/preprints/pull/68, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro recommend-accept

roboneuro commented 1 year ago
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
roboneuro commented 1 year ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.54294/uvnhin is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.29216 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102849 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2021.3052101 is OK
- 10.1002/cmr.a.21357 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.004 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.22423 is OK
- 10.1038/s41596-021-00588-0 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-021-01044-0 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2020.611194 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28020 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.020 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1834 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.041 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1038/nbt.3820 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-019-0262-8 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009651 is OK
- 10.1093/cercor/bhaa288 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00008 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.074 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1007/s00330-016-4485-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116364 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081 is OK
- 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000510 is OK
- 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000720 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03262 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28825 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02343 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.29292 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-022-01571-4 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26982 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0252966 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26235 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.27421 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25122 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.040 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0189944 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100357 is OK
- 10.1038/nature11971 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26069 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.4564 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.61523 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0069294 is OK
- 10.1111/cpf.12387 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.25168 is OK
- 10.3389/fneur.2022.855125 is OK
- 10.1177/1352458520923970 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.002 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.26058 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-24304-3 is OK
- 10.1088/0031-9155/23/5/012 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.22590 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119488 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.20984 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119751 is OK
- 10.18632/aging.103629 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.10062 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.1880050111 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.25135 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28779 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116889 is OK
- 10.58530/2022/3906 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137 is OK
- 10.1155/2014/719520 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117910 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.25693 is OK
- 10.1038/srep45261 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103228 is OK
- 10.1109/42.906424 is OK
- 10.31219/osf.io/h89js is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009651 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011230 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
roboneuro commented 1 year ago

:wave: @neurolibre/executable-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.

Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article

If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/neurolibre/preprints/pull/69, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro accept

roboneuro commented 1 year ago
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
roboneuro commented 1 year ago

Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.

If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.

You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:

CITATION.cff

``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Boudreau given-names: Mathieu orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7726-4456" - family-names: Karakuzu given-names: Agah orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7283-271X" - family-names: Boré given-names: Arnaud orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4822-1211" - family-names: Pinsard given-names: Basile orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4391-3075" - family-names: Zelenkovski given-names: Kiril orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-7004" - family-names: Alonso-Ortiz given-names: Eva orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-7234" - family-names: Boyle given-names: Julie orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-221X" - family-names: Bellec given-names: Pierre orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-0699" - family-names: Cohen-Adad given-names: Julien orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-9532" contact: - family-names: Boudreau given-names: Mathieu orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7726-4456" doi: 10.55458 message: To reference this work, please cite our reproducible preprint in NeuroLibre. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Boudreau given-names: Mathieu orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7726-4456" - family-names: Karakuzu given-names: Agah orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7283-271X" - family-names: Boré given-names: Arnaud orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4822-1211" - family-names: Pinsard given-names: Basile orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4391-3075" - family-names: Zelenkovski given-names: Kiril orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-7004" - family-names: Alonso-Ortiz given-names: Eva orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-7234" - family-names: Boyle given-names: Julie orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-221X" - family-names: Bellec given-names: Pierre orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-0699" - family-names: Cohen-Adad given-names: Julien orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-9532" date-published: 2023-10-25 doi: 10.55458/neurolibre.00018 journal: NeuroLibre Reproducible Preprints publisher: name: NeuroLibre start: 18 title: Longitudinal stability of brain and spinal cord quantitative MRI measures type: preprint url: "https://neurolibre.org/papers/10.55458/neurolibre.00018" title: Longitudinal stability of brain and spinal cord quantitative MRI measures ```

If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.

Find more information on .cff files here and here.

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

🌰🌱🌺 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST PUBLISHED A NEUROLIBRE REPRODUCIBLE PREPRINT! 🌺🌸🍀

Here's what you must now do:

  1. Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/neurolibre/preprints/pull/70
  2. Wait a couple of minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.55458/neurolibre.00018
  3. If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
  4. Party like you just published more than a PDF! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

agahkarakuzu commented 1 year ago

@roboneuro production sync pdf

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

:seedling::recycle::page_facing_up: Synced the summary PDF from the source, should be now available at https://preprint.neurolibre.org/10.55458/neurolibre.00018.pdf?no-cache

roboneuro commented 1 year ago

🌰 🌱 🌺 Congratulations on your NeuroLibre Reproducible Preprint (NRP)! 🍀 🚀 ♻️

By publishing this NRP, you've gone beyond simply posting another traditional preprint, demonstrating your commitment to transparency and reproducibility in presenting your new findings. This achievement is certainly something to take pride in, and if you wish to showcase it in your repository:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://neurolibre.org/papers/10.55458/neurolibre.00018/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.55458/neurolibre.00018)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.55458/neurolibre.00018">
  <img src="https://neurolibre.org/papers/10.55458/neurolibre.00018/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://neurolibre.org/papers/10.55458/neurolibre.00018/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.55458/neurolibre.00018

This is how it will look in your, e.g., README:

DOI

We need your help!

NeuroLibre is a community-run reproducible preprint server and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

For details, please visit our documentation