Open dengemann opened 8 years ago
Started linking files programmatically from DYNACOMP to avoid pain. MNE has certain assumptions about directory layoud, all my code has. Also it is cleaner like this I think. Left a few comments on my commit: 1b2e81013a8a62186ce0ee8f57187993a151d5d7
Another questions is where do I find the freesurfer files for these guys?
cc @philouc @virvw @darialarocca
ok cool / we do need folders on meg_tmp to be consistent and give pointers to:
so better if you stick to dynacomp
yousra made a nice clean folder check yousra/subjects/
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Denis A. Engemann <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Started linking files programmatically from DYNACOMP to avoid pain. MNE has certain assumptions about directory layoud, all my code has. Also it is cleaner like this I think. Left a few comments on my commit: 1b2e810 https://github.com/neurospin/meg_study_dynamic_scales/commit/1b2e81013a8a62186ce0ee8f57187993a151d5d7
Another questions is where do I find the freesurfer files for these guys?
cc @philouc https://github.com/philouc @virvw https://github.com/virvw @darialarocca https://github.com/darialarocca
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/neurospin/meg_study_dynamic_scales/issues/1#issuecomment-159960018 .
Virginie van Wassenhove Virginie.van.Wassenhove@gmail.com work: +33(0)1.69.08.1667 skype: virginie_vw https://sites.google.com/site/virginievanwassenhove/
This is incompatible with git-tracking your code. But I could create a dummy folder that respects the local conventions and clone this repo inside there. For the rest linking is far better. The files in dyacomp have a very nested layout and that folder is already too big. We need a flat 1-level depth subjects folder, same for MEG.
On 26 Nov 2015, at 18:25, Virginie van Wassenhove notifications@github.com wrote:
ok cool / we do need folders on meg_tmp to be consistent and give pointers to:
- name of the researcher
- date of project
- project name
so better if you stick to dynacomp
yousra made a nice clean folder check yousra/subjects/
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Denis A. Engemann <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Started linking files programmatically from DYNACOMP to avoid pain. MNE has certain assumptions about directory layoud, all my code has. Also it is cleaner like this I think. Left a few comments on my commit: 1b2e810 https://github.com/neurospin/meg_study_dynamic_scales/commit/1b2e81013a8a62186ce0ee8f57187993a151d5d7
Another questions is where do I find the freesurfer files for these guys?
cc @philouc https://github.com/philouc @virvw https://github.com/virvw @darialarocca https://github.com/darialarocca
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/neurospin/meg_study_dynamic_scales/issues/1#issuecomment-159960018 .
Virginie van Wassenhove Virginie.van.Wassenhove@gmail.com work: +33(0)1.69.08.1667 skype: virginie_vw https://sites.google.com/site/virginievanwassenhove/ — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Sorry for my late reply @dengemann @virvw I have the summary sheet for subject rg_110386 where Nicolas has written for the empty_raw recording "-> Dossier no_name" ; Mayber check this folder out ? in the subject directory???
for rg_110386 we would expect 130606 as far as I understand it, 130606 is not in the empty room directory. Maybe I can sort it out with one of you tomorrow at Neurosping. Now time for a pleasant hack in the Navette.
you were @nspn! were did you hide?
re. organization, I trust you master the whole thing, only pointing out to organizational needs / traceability (one of Sébastien's duty now)
re. subfolders in the subject folder, 130606 was likely the 6th of June 2013, aka the date at which acquisitions were made. (meg_acq databasing --> 1 subject may have many dates)
hopefully a pleasant navette trip - tomorrow's traffic will likely be a nightmare.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Denis A. Engemann <notifications@github.com
wrote:
The other question is still remaining. For one subject we don't seem to have an empty room recording.
for rg_110386 we would expect 130606 as far as I understand it, 130606 is not in the empty room directory. Maybe I can sort it out with one of you tomorrow at Neurosping. Now time for a pleasant hack in the Navette.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/neurospin/meg_study_dynamic_scales/issues/1#issuecomment-159966581 .
Virginie van Wassenhove Virginie.van.Wassenhove@gmail.com work: +33(0)1.69.08.1667 skype: virginie_vw https://sites.google.com/site/virginievanwassenhove/
yes and so it is probable that one out of 36 participants have a missing empty-room, not sure how Nicolas managed it for MF
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Virginie van Wassenhove < virginie.van.wassenhove@gmail.com> wrote:
you were @nspn! were did you hide?
re. organization, I trust you master the whole thing, only pointing out to organizational needs / traceability (one of Sébastien's duty now)
re. subfolders in the subject folder, 130606 was likely the 6th of June 2013, aka the date at which acquisitions were made. (meg_acq databasing --> 1 subject may have many dates)
hopefully a pleasant navette trip - tomorrow's traffic will likely be a nightmare.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Denis A. Engemann < notifications@github.com> wrote:
The other question is still remaining. For one subject we don't seem to have an empty room recording.
for rg_110386 we would expect 130606 as far as I understand it, 130606 is not in the empty room directory. Maybe I can sort it out with one of you tomorrow at Neurosping. Now time for a pleasant hack in the Navette.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/neurospin/meg_study_dynamic_scales/issues/1#issuecomment-159966581 .
Virginie van Wassenhove Virginie.van.Wassenhove@gmail.com work: +33(0)1.69.08.1667 skype: virginie_vw https://sites.google.com/site/virginievanwassenhove/
Virginie van Wassenhove Virginie.van.Wassenhove@gmail.com work: +33(0)1.69.08.1667 skype: virginie_vw https://sites.google.com/site/virginievanwassenhove/
Alright, finished the linking script and created a subfolder for my git-tracked code inside the Dynacomp. There we now have a clear mapping of things that support writing flat and boring (good!) code.
de246814@is210297:/neurospin/meg/meg_tmp/Dynacomp_Ciuciu_2011$ ls 2015_Denis/meg_study_dynamic_scales/data/MEG
aa_100234-110531 bl_110396-111025 da_110453-111124 gc_100388-110309 jh_110224-110630 ks_110142-110609 mj_130216-130529 na_110353-111006 rg_110386-130606
ak_130184-130619 cd_100449-120403 fb_110137-110512 in_110286-110719 jm_100042-120402 ld_110370-110922 mn_080208-110718 nc_110174-110421 sa_130042-130618
ap_110299-120405 cl_100240-110623 fp_110067-110301 jd_110235-130625 jm_100109-110412 ma_130185-130529 mp_110340-110908 pc_110210-110517 tl_110313-110906
bd_120417-130625 cm_110222-110809 ga_130053-130610 jh_100405-110308 kr_080082-111011 mb_110421-111206 mr_080072-130620 pe_110338-110912 vr_100551-110510
de246814@is210297:/neurospin/meg/meg_tmp/Dynacomp_Ciuciu_2011$ ls 2015_Denis/meg_study_dynamic_scales/data/subjects/
aa_100234-110531 cd_100449-120403 fp_110067-110301 jd_110235-130625 kr_080082-111011 mj_130216-130529 na_110353-111006 rg_110386-130606
ak_130184-130619 cl_100240-110623 fsaverage jh_100405-110308 ks_110142-110609 mn_080208-110718 nc_110174-110421 sa_130042-130618
ap_110299-120405 cm_110222-110809 ga_130053-130610 jh_110224-110630 ld_110370-110922 morph-maps ns110383 tl_110313-110906
bd_120417-130625 da_110453-111124 gc_100388-110309 jm_100042-120402 ma_130185-130529 mp_110340-110908 pc_110210-110517 vr_100551-110510
bl_110396-111025 fb_110137-110512 in_110286-110719 jm_100109-110412 mb_110421-111206 mr_080072-130620 pe_110338-110912
de246814@is210297:/neurospin/meg/meg_tmp/Dynacomp_Ciuciu_2011$ ls 2015_Denis/meg_study_dynamic_scales/data/MEG
MEG/ MEG-ER/
de246814@is210297:/neurospin/meg/meg_tmp/Dynacomp_Ciuciu_2011$ ls 2015_Denis/meg_study_dynamic_scales/data/MEG-ER/
aa_100234-110531 cd_100449-120403 fb_110137-110512 in_110286-110719 jm_100042-120402 ld_110370-110922 mp_110340-110908 pc_110210-110517 vr_100551-110510
ak_130184-130619 cl_100240-110623 fp_110067-110301 jd_110235-130625 jm_100109-110412 mb_110421-111206 mr_080072-130620 pe_110338-110912
ap_110299-120405 cm_110222-110809 ga_130053-130610 jh_100405-110308 kr_080082-111011 mj_130216-130529 na_110353-111006 sa_130042-130618
bl_110396-111025 da_110453-111124 gc_100388-110309 jh_110224-110630 ks_110142-110609 mn_080208-110718 nc_110174-110421 tl_110313-110906
As explained in the readme 'data' is not tracked by git, but all code assumes that the data are there. It means if you clone this repo locally just make sure to put the links in data and you're fine. For /neurospin/meg I did it as you can see.
great - have you solved the missing empty room?
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Denis A. Engemann <notifications@github.com
wrote:
As explained in the readme 'data' is not tracked by git, but all code assumes that the data are there. It means if you clone this repo locally just make sure to put the links in data and you're fine. For /neurospin/meg I did it as you can see.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/neurospin/meg_study_dynamic_scales/issues/1#issuecomment-160149545 .
Virginie van Wassenhove Virginie.van.Wassenhove@gmail.com work: +33(0)1.69.08.1667 skype: virginie_vw https://sites.google.com/site/virginievanwassenhove/
great - have you solved the missing empty room?
No and it's not a blocker now, porting actual code now to do actual analyses.
ok nice - and it looks terrific on github! great w-e to you!
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Denis A. Engemann <notifications@github.com
wrote:
great - have you solved the missing empty room?
No and it's not a blocker now, porting actual code now to do actual analyses.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/neurospin/meg_study_dynamic_scales/issues/1#issuecomment-160173738 .
Virginie van Wassenhove Virginie.van.Wassenhove@gmail.com work: +33(0)1.69.08.1667 skype: virginie_vw https://sites.google.com/site/virginievanwassenhove/
Tanks Denis for your efforts and involvement. If the file you're looking for is "empty_raw_sss.fif" for subject rg_110386 then you can get it in the subfolder Results/data/SSS/AVr/rg_110386/130606 I hope this helps. Phil
So I'd say we have a set of ICA solutions to work with.
The info summary, the html reports and the ica.fif files can be found here:
/neurospin/meg/meg_tmp/Dynacomp_Ciuciu_2011/2015_Denis/meg_study_dynamic_scales/results/run_preproc_ica/current-2015-12-02_12-26-31
Out of the previous attempt the one that has 'current' in it is the one to use.
For convenience here is the automatically generated summary, detailing 2 misses for ECG according to minimum amplitude ranges (Magneotmeter). We discussed this already, it means there are not sufficient artifacts to model and remove them.
I will clone this repo in
/neurospin/meg/meg_tmp
and start adding scripts for preprocessing, inverse solution and all we need. I'll then add to the library some functions for 1/f and alpha.