The current emerald point data isn't the best, primarily because the labels are pretty messy. They are only point measurements that are converted to circles based on the recorded radius.
The data from our post-fire surveys (soon to be released) has much higher quality polygon labels. I think it would be good to choose one or two sites from that as our example. The example constants would need to be updated, and likely the notebooks would need some tweaks.
russelldj
commented
5 days ago
The current emerald point data isn't the best, primarily because the labels are pretty messy. They are only point measurements that are converted to circles based on the recorded radius.
The data from our post-fire surveys (soon to be released) has much higher quality polygon labels. I think it would be good to choose one or two sites from that as our example. The example constants would need to be updated, and likely the notebooks would need some tweaks.