Closed mprather closed 1 year ago
The spec documentation for oml 2 has lot of extra ticks in all code snippets. This looks like a bad parse resulting in confusing/incorrect examples.
`@`dc:title "Example1 Ontology" `@`dc:date "2/15/2021"^^xsd:dateTime `` `<`http://company.com/example1#`>` `as` example1 `{` `` `<`http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/`>` `as` dc `` `<`http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#`>` `as` rdfs `` `<`http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#`>` `as` rdfs `` `<`http://io.opencaesar/viewpoint#`>` `as` viewpoint `` `<`http://company.com/example2#`>` `as` example2 `@`rdfs:comment "This is member1"$en `@`rdfs:comment "C’est member1"$fr `@`rdfs:seeAlso example2:Member2 `` Member1 `@`viewpoint:show // a missing literal is interpreted as Boolean true literal `ref` `` example2:Member2 `}`
Fix docs to remove unnecessary ticks.
Fixed this issue in the spec: https://www.opencaesar.io/oml
Description
The spec documentation for oml 2 has lot of extra ticks in all code snippets. This looks like a bad parse resulting in confusing/incorrect examples.
Expected Behavior
Fix docs to remove unnecessary ticks.