search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: IRXCT: Iterative Reconstruction and visualization application for X-ray Computed Tomography #1588

Closed whedon closed 5 years ago

whedon commented 5 years ago

Submitting author: @dntrinca (D Narcis Trinca) Repository: https://github.com/dntrinca/IRXCT Version: 1.0 Editor: @usethedata Reviewer: Pending

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dntrinca. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@dntrinca if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 5 years ago 
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

ghost commented 5 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 5 years ago 
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

ghost commented 5 years ago

@usethedata , I just finished the necessary additions; let me know if this is OK..Best, D Narcis

usethedata commented 5 years ago

@dntrinca My apologies for being less responsive than I should. It's been a crazy week. I'll go over things and start working on getting reviewers.

ghost commented 5 years ago

@usethedata Dear Bruce, That is very good, I am looking forward to hear from you soon. Best, D Narcis

usethedata commented 5 years ago

@brechmos @martlj @rlizzo Would a couple of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

brechmos commented 5 years ago

Typically I would be more than happy to, but I do not have access to a Windows machine and have never done Windows programming. Given that, I would find it hard to do a proper review of the code and software. :/ Sorry.

ghost commented 5 years ago

@usethedata Dear Bruce, Did you find any reviewers ? I know it might be hard to find, as most of the scientific codes are in Matlab in general..But myself I wrote in Visual C++ to do a real Windows application, professionally written, and which does not require anything to be installed on a Windows system..

Given the situation, do you think it is a priority to review the code ? The submission has a step-by step manual that shows all the functionalities if it is followed properly..

Best, and let me know when you have some news.. D Narcis

martlj commented 5 years ago

Hi, apologies for the slow reply. Medical CT is a bit outside of my usual domain and I don't use Windows either so I'm not best placed to give a thorough review of this I'm afraid.

ghost commented 5 years ago

@abhishekbajpayee @rlizzo @casperdcl Hello, is any of you willing to review this submission concerning a Windows program for tomography reconstruction? Best Regards, D Narcis

ghost commented 5 years ago

@usethedata @danielskatz Hello, with this message I want to tell you that I withdraw my work from this journal..

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

I'm sorry to hear this, and that we didn't do a better job with this review.

casperdcl commented 5 years ago

yes sorry I work more in PET and PET-MRI, and also prefer avoiding windows and avoiding matlab.