[PRE REVIEW]: Soundata: Reproducible use of audio datasets

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@magdalenafuentes<!--end-author-handle-- (Magdalena Fuentes) Repository: https://github.com/soundata/soundata Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.1.3 Editor: !--editor-->@faroit<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @hagenw, @hadware Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1b5f2c6b6aa01aa6d6410b71619239b8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1b5f2c6b6aa01aa6d6410b71619239b8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1b5f2c6b6aa01aa6d6410b71619239b8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1b5f2c6b6aa01aa6d6410b71619239b8)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @magdalenafuentes. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@magdalenafuentes if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Crowsetta: A Python tool to work with any format for annotating animal vocalizations and bioacoustics data. Submitting author: @NickleDave Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active) Reviewers: @oliviaguest Similarity score: 0.8132

s(ound)lab: An easy to learn Python package for designing and running psychoacoustic experiments. Submitting author: @DrMarc Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @hadware, @sneakers-the-rat Similarity score: 0.7958

guitarsounds: A Python package to visualize harmonic sounds for musical instrument design Submitting author: @olivecha Handling editor: @bmcfee (Active) Reviewers: @cwitkowitz, @ebezzam Similarity score: 0.7938

Sync Toolbox: A Python Package for Efficient, Robust, and Accurate Music Synchronization Submitting author: @yiitozer Handling editor: @faroit (Active) Reviewers: @lutzhamel, @magdalenafuentes Similarity score: 0.7897

SODAR Core: a Django-based framework for scientific data management and analysis web apps Submitting author: @mikkonie Handling editor: @lpantano (Active) Reviewers: @rbatorsky, @olgabot Similarity score: 0.7878

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check repository

👋 @openjournals/dev - do you know why this command didn't run automatically?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check references

👋 @openjournals/dev - do you know why this command didn't run automatically?

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=12.77 s (12.5 files/s, 282959.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                            32              0              0        3587269
Python                         100           4179           5751          12252
reStructuredText                 9            628            975            629
YAML                             9             42             22            304
XML                              1              0              0            250
Markdown                         4            107              0            214
CSS                              1             34              0            124
TeX                              1              9              0             75
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           159           5011           6756        3601152
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 2683

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1163/1574-9347_dnp_e612900 may be a valid DOI for title: Keras
- 10.3390/app6060162 may be a valid DOI for title: Metrics for polyphonic sound event detection

INVALID DOIs

- None

[danielskatz]

👋 @magdalenafuentes - thanks for your submission. Before we get started with the review, there are a couple of issues:

1. Your paper is quite a bit too long. JOSS has a normal upper limit of roughly 1000 words, and your paper is close to 3000. Please see the example paper for an example of a typical JOSS paper.

2. In addition, you could work on the possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references to check again.

Once you have made changes in the paper, whether this is content or references, please use the command @editorialbot generate pdf to make a new PDF.

editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.

I'll put this on pause until you tell me it's ready to start because these two issues have been resolved

[tanmayy24]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1163/1574-9347_dnp_e612900 may be a valid DOI for title: Keras
- 10.3390/app6060162 may be a valid DOI for title: Metrics for polyphonic sound event detection

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1163/2214-8647_bnp_e612900 may be a valid DOI for title: Keras
- 10.3390/app6060162 may be a valid DOI for title: Metrics for polyphonic sound event detection

INVALID DOIs

- None

[guillemcortes]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.48550/arXiv.2109.02846 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3527750 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1605.08695 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4061782 is OK
- 10.3390/app6060162 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2106.04624 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1163/2214-8647_bnp_e612900 may be a valid DOI for title: Keras

INVALID DOIs

- None

[magdalenafuentes]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @magdalenafuentes, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[magdalenafuentes]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Crowsetta: A Python tool to work with any format for annotating animal vocalizations and bioacoustics data. Submitting author: @NickleDave Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active) Reviewers: @oliviaguest Similarity score: 0.8216

s(ound)lab: An easy to learn Python package for designing and running psychoacoustic experiments. Submitting author: @DrMarc Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @hadware, @sneakers-the-rat Similarity score: 0.8000

guitarsounds: A Python package to visualize harmonic sounds for musical instrument design Submitting author: @olivecha Handling editor: @bmcfee (Active) Reviewers: @cwitkowitz, @ebezzam Similarity score: 0.7975

Sync Toolbox: A Python Package for Efficient, Robust, and Accurate Music Synchronization Submitting author: @yiitozer Handling editor: @faroit (Active) Reviewers: @lutzhamel, @magdalenafuentes Similarity score: 0.7935

DataLad: distributed system for joint management of code, data, and their relationship Submitting author: @yarikoptic Handling editor: @arokem (Retired) Reviewers: @szorowi1, @jkanche Similarity score: 0.7914

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[magdalenafuentes]

@editorialbot check repository

[magdalenafuentes]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.48550/arXiv.2109.02846 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3527750 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1605.08695 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4061782 is OK
- 10.3390/app6060162 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2106.04624 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1163/2214-8647_bnp_e612900 may be a valid DOI for title: Keras

INVALID DOIs

- None

[magdalenafuentes]

Hey @danielskatz, thanks for moving this along. We shorten the paper significantly and included the DOIs, thanks for pointing those out! We're not sure how to check the word count (the tools we're using don't seem to match the word count here), but we did our best to get close to the example paper. Please let us know if further changes are needed and thanks again!

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check repository

[danielskatz]

@openjournals/dev - any idea why I'm getting a bunch of command failures in this repo?

[danielskatz]

Thanks @magdalenafuentes - I see that the reference warning is a false positive, so that part looks fine.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check repository

[xuanxu]

I see Out of memory (Memory quota vastly exceeded) errors in the server logs, probably that's caused by the size of the repo. I'll try to add some measures.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check repository

[danielskatz]

@magdalenafuentes - @xuanxu reports that our tooling, which isn't currently working consistently due to the size of the repository, produces Wordcount for paper.md is 1603. Can you try to remove a bit more?

[guillemcortes]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Crowsetta: A Python tool to work with any format for annotating animal vocalizations and bioacoustics data. Submitting author: @NickleDave Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active) Reviewers: @oliviaguest Similarity score: 0.8177

s(ound)lab: An easy to learn Python package for designing and running psychoacoustic experiments. Submitting author: @DrMarc Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @hadware, @sneakers-the-rat Similarity score: 0.8023

guitarsounds: A Python package to visualize harmonic sounds for musical instrument design Submitting author: @olivecha Handling editor: @bmcfee (Active) Reviewers: @cwitkowitz, @ebezzam Similarity score: 0.7964

DataLad: distributed system for joint management of code, data, and their relationship Submitting author: @yarikoptic Handling editor: @arokem (Retired) Reviewers: @szorowi1, @jkanche Similarity score: 0.7912

Sync Toolbox: A Python Package for Efficient, Robust, and Accurate Music Synchronization Submitting author: @yiitozer Handling editor: @faroit (Active) Reviewers: @lutzhamel, @magdalenafuentes Similarity score: 0.7901

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[guillemcortes]

Hi @danielskatz , we've reduced it to 1121 words (if we don't count the header with authors information and the references the word count goes down to 979). Let us know if that's enough.

[guillemcortes]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Crowsetta: A Python tool to work with any format for annotating animal vocalizations and bioacoustics data. Submitting author: @NickleDave Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active) Reviewers: @oliviaguest Similarity score: 0.8229

s(ound)lab: An easy to learn Python package for designing and running psychoacoustic experiments. Submitting author: @DrMarc Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @hadware, @sneakers-the-rat Similarity score: 0.8046

guitarsounds: A Python package to visualize harmonic sounds for musical instrument design Submitting author: @olivecha Handling editor: @bmcfee (Active) Reviewers: @cwitkowitz, @ebezzam Similarity score: 0.7998

Sync Toolbox: A Python Package for Efficient, Robust, and Accurate Music Synchronization Submitting author: @yiitozer Handling editor: @faroit (Active) Reviewers: @lutzhamel, @magdalenafuentes Similarity score: 0.7956

TraViA: a Traffic data Visualization and Annotation tool in Python Submitting author: @OlgerSiebinga Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @rusu24edward, @tomalrussell Similarity score: 0.7926

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

Hi @danielskatz , we've reduced it to 1121 words (if we don't count the header with authors information and the references the word count goes down to 979). Let us know if that's enough.

Yes, thanks - this looks fine

[danielskatz]

👋 @faroit - would you be willing to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @faroit as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[guillemcortes]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[guillemcortes]

Regenerating the pdf since we've modified the figures to avoid unwanted page breaks

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Crowsetta: A Python tool to work with any format for annotating animal vocalizations and bioacoustics data. Submitting author: @NickleDave Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active) Reviewers: @oliviaguest Similarity score: 0.8254

s(ound)lab: An easy to learn Python package for designing and running psychoacoustic experiments. Submitting author: @DrMarc Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @hadware, @sneakers-the-rat Similarity score: 0.8047

guitarsounds: A Python package to visualize harmonic sounds for musical instrument design Submitting author: @olivecha Handling editor: @bmcfee (Active) Reviewers: @cwitkowitz, @ebezzam Similarity score: 0.8028

Sync Toolbox: A Python Package for Efficient, Robust, and Accurate Music Synchronization Submitting author: @yiitozer Handling editor: @faroit (Active) Reviewers: @lutzhamel, @magdalenafuentes Similarity score: 0.7960

TraViA: a Traffic data Visualization and Annotation tool in Python Submitting author: @OlgerSiebinga Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @rusu24edward, @tomalrussell Similarity score: 0.7913

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[faroit]

@danielskatz i would love to edit this submission but I would like to verify possible COIs according to our policy. I know Magdalena from conferences but I can't remember any research or publication we have done together. @magdalenafuentes can you please confirm and check on your side as well, please?

[magdalenafuentes]

Hey @faroit 👋 I don't think we have directly contributed in any project or publication together, so I don't think we have a COI

[danielskatz]

👋 @faroit - Given this lack of a COI, I can assign this to you, or of course, you can self-assign it...

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot assign @faroit as editor

👋 @faroit - I'm going ahead and assigning you based on the previous comments here. If this is a problem, let me know and I'll figure something else out - thanks!!

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @faroit is now the editor