Closed mohdkarim closed 2 years ago
The harmonised summary stats[1] already looks like that:
hm_variant_id 2_27508073_T_C
hm_rsid rs1260326
hm_chrom 2
hm_pos 27508073
hm_other_allele T
hm_effect_allele C
hm_beta 0.1159
hm_odds_ratio NA
hm_ci_lower NA
hm_ci_upper NA
hm_effect_allele_frequency NA
hm_code 10
variant_id rs1260326
other_allele t
effect_allele c
p_value 5.68e-133
beta 0.1159
standard_error 0.0049
odds_ratio NA
chromosome 2
effect_allele_frequency NA
ci_lower NA
ci_upper NA
[1] ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/gwas/summary_statistics/GCST000001-GCST001000/GCST000758/harmonised/20686565-GCST000758-EFO_0004530.h.tsv.gz
I will take a look and filp betas if needed
Summary statistics with reviewed beta direction have now been released for Teslovich TM (2010) for 4 traits (Triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-C, and LDL-C). https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/publications/20686565
This issue has been fixed in the development branch and it will be available in production in the upcoming portal release.
I'm closing the issue, but please @Jeremy37 report if there are any further actions required to prevent us from flipping the betas again now that they have been fixed at the source. Thank you @buniello for the fix
We report sumstats from Teslovich TM (2010) for 4 traits (Triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-C, and LDL-C). On comparing the signs of a few of the top variant effect estimates from the study page for each of the four traits, it appears that the beta sign does not correspond to the ALT allele.
Example: https://genetics.opentargets.org/variant/2_27508073_T_C (rs1260326) reports positive association of C-allele (ALT) with triglycerides when the paper (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039276/figure/F1/?report=objectonly) reports positive association with the T-allele (REF), so the association with C-allele should be negative. This issue of flipped betas is present for all the variants we report for Teslovich TM (2010) across the four traits in our portal.