Open prashantuniyal02 opened 4 months ago
Discussed with @DSuveges and decided: the pan-cancer associations are dropped from the updated evidence set
For the second task (literature field) one option would be to add a Pacini et al, 2024 link to the Project Score widget header, after the Project Score link. (just a suggestion if this is easier for FE)
Wouldn't it be useful for the work of timestamping evidence (https://github.com/opentargets/issues/issues/2739) to include the PMID in each evidence? The FE could display in the widget header.
Discussed in team leads meet: no action taken on the Adding a literature column
task for now. Link to data source contains new reference.
Background
MONDO_0004992
) "cancer". However these associations don't have disease cell lines attached. How that would impact on the project score widget?Example associations endpoint response:
``` { "targetFromSource": "SOX10", "diseaseFromSource": "pancancer", "diseaseFromSourceMappedId": "MONDO_0004992", "resourceScore": 78.98182, "targetFromSourceId": "ENSG00000100146", "literature": [ "38215750" ], "datasourceId": "crispr", "datatypeId": "affected_pathway" } ```There's no
diseaseCellLines
object that is used for generating the drawerCurrent implementation:
Tasks
Adding a literature columnSee details here.