Open thomaskolmans opened 1 year ago
We actually need to be able to use OTM for Maritime transport.
Thank again for your contribution @thomaskolmans. Both make sense to me. (though I do wonder what the exact definition is of a terminal). Lets discuss it next meeting.
Accepted, we might want to consider more types as well before the next release
Maybe it is a good idea to also make an other
type and include a otherLocationType
field that can be filled in that case like we do for fuel
? Though I am in favor of being complete the problem is that there always will be very specific types for certain operations that will not make it into OTM.
@woutvandenheuvel is going to look into existing code lists and see how we can integrate that with the existing enum.
After discussion this is accepted. Even though we expect more types to be needed in the future
Type of request
Is your feature request related to a problem? The model currently does not support
fuelStation
location types norterminal
.Describe the solution you'd like Adding
fuelStation
andterminal
as a types to the LocationType enum. For integration purposes and also with the addition of the fuel action, this seems like a logical addition.Describe alternatives you've considered None