Closed abesto closed 6 years ago
Good thought on factoring out the docker image. I won't include that in this PR to preserve consistency across the CircleCI-built repos; sounds like a good improvement if we decide to stay with Circle / use it more long-term.
good start. we will need to switch to 9 soon, but a straight port makes sense now.
As part of https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin/issues/2102
Used https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin-aws/pull/95 as a template;
diff
between the 1.0circle.yml
files:So essentially the same, except for the copyright year and that
zipkin-azure
is on JDK 8.diff
of 2.0.circleci/config.yml
after this PR: