search

operator-framework / enhancements

Apache License 2.0
9 stars 40 forks source link

Proposal for run bundle-upgrade #27

Closed rashmigottipati closed 4 years ago

rashmigottipati commented 4 years ago

Question:

Is it valid to assume that in the case of bundle-upgrade, we don't have to consider a scenario where an OperatorGroup is not present? In the case of run-bundle, we have a scenario where there is an operator that supports install a set of install modes being installed into a namespace with no OperatorGroup.

Can you help clarify for the case of upgrade? I'm thinking the operator that we are upgrading will probably have an OperatorGroup present and this will be the only case to consider.

@joelanford @estroz

shawn-hurley commented 4 years ago

Looks good to me, unless the first open question is a blocker?

shawn-hurley commented 4 years ago

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.