search

operator-framework / enhancements

Apache License 2.0
9 stars 40 forks source link

Enhancement proposal for specifying optional manifests #95

Closed fgiloux closed 2 years ago

fgiloux commented 2 years ago

This is to address feature request: #2375

fgiloux commented 2 years ago

Can we also call out the need to reimplement something like this in a provisioner in rukpak vs just implementing it there?

I can surely add something in regards to have this supported in other package managers. That said, rukpak is still very early phase so that I cannot comment on how this would get reflected there

fgiloux commented 2 years ago

@kevinrizza I have pushed a new version. Let me know whether this addresses your points or more work is required

fgiloux commented 2 years ago

Following on our second discussion during OLM working group on November 4: @njhale you stated that you favor the alternative that is described in the document as "Bundle metadata". As there is currently no metadata recorded at the bundle level specific to the manifests shipped within the bundles could you please describe what your vision is of how it should look like?

kevinrizza commented 2 years ago

/approve

fgiloux commented 2 years ago

Can we also call out the need to reimplement something like this in a provisioner in rukpak vs just implementing it there?

I can surely add something in regards to have this supported in other package managers. That said, rukpak is still very early phase so that I cannot comment on how this would get reflected there

Done

fgiloux commented 2 years ago

@kevinrizza @njhale can the enhancement proposal get merged or is there anything more needed? When that's done I can work on the implementation.