Closed samuelstroschein closed 2 weeks ago
cc @jannes.blobel who proposed this
One problem is increased ambiguity for expressing that changes only exist in X. Source & Target might as well be just fine. Incoming is an interpretation of what the source (of changes) is that should be merged with target.
commonChanges
changesOnlyInSource
changesOnlyInTarget
commonChanges
incomingChanges // amibigious. what are incoming changes?
targetChanges
commonChanges
changesOnlyInIncoming // ugly
changesOnlyInTarget
tbh terminology is good enough
Context
Source can be confusing.
Is source where the changes are coming from or where changes are merged into?
Proposal
Use
incoming
instead ofsource
."Incoming changes are merged into the target"