Open Christian-MK opened 1 month ago
Would they be narrower terms? (more specific?)
I don't see the harm of adding them. For context, they're just two distinct pieces of software, or modules that are invoked as routines of the collector software and their output forwarded to the validator.
@prefix : <http://glossary.orcfax.io/#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
:cexCollector
skos:prefLabel "collector-node"@en;
skos:definition '''
A Distinct piece of software which is invoked by a
collector node in order to query the sources underpinning
a given cex feed.
''' ;
skos:broader :collectorNode ;
skos:related :cntCollector.
@prefix : <http://glossary.orcfax.io/#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
:cntCollector
skos:prefLabel "collector-node"@en;
skos:definition '''
A Distinct piece of software which is invoked by a
collector node in order to query the sources underpinning
a given cnt feed.
''' ;
skos:broader :collectorNode ;
skos:related :cexCollector.
The definition of collectorNode introduces a difference between CEX and CNT collectors. Should these be distinct terms in the glossary?