The aim for this repository is to contain clean, readable and tested code to reproduce few-shot learning research.
This project is written in python 3.6 and Pytorch and assumes you have a GPU.
See these Medium articles for some more information
Listed in requirements.txt
. Install with pip install -r requirements.txt
preferably in a virtualenv.
Edit the DATA_PATH
variable in config.py
to the location where
you store the Omniglot and miniImagenet datasets.
After acquiring the data and running the setup scripts your folder structure should look like
DATA_PATH/
Omniglot/
images_background/
images_evaluation/
miniImageNet/
images_background/
images_evaluation/
Omniglot dataset. Download from https://github.com/brendenlake/omniglot/tree/master/python,
place the extracted files into DATA_PATH/Omniglot_Raw
and run
scripts/prepare_omniglot.py
miniImageNet dataset. Download files from
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3Irx3uQNoBMQ1FlNXJsZUdYWEE/view,
place in data/miniImageNet/images
and run scripts/prepare_mini_imagenet.py
After adding the datasets run pytest
in the root directory to run
all tests.
The file experiments/experiments.txt
contains the hyperparameters I
used to obtain the results given below.
Run experiments/proto_nets.py
to reproduce results from Prototpyical
Networks for Few-shot Learning
(Snell et al).
Arguments
Omniglot | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
k-way | 5 | 5 | 20 | 20 |
n-shot | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
Published | 98.8 | 99.7 | 96.0 | 98.9 |
This Repo | 98.2 | 99.4 | 95.8 | 98.6 |
miniImageNet | ||
---|---|---|
k-way | 5 | 5 |
n-shot | 1 | 5 |
Published | 49.4 | 68.2 |
This Repo | 48.0 | 66.2 |
A differentiable nearest neighbours classifier.
Run experiments/matching_nets.py
to reproduce results from Matching
Networks for One Shot Learning
(Vinyals et al).
Arguments
I had trouble reproducing the results of this paper using the cosine distance metric as I found the converge to be slow and final performance dependent on the random initialisation. However I was able to reproduce (and slightly exceed) the results of this paper using the l2 distance metric.
Omniglot | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
k-way | 5 | 5 | 20 | 20 |
n-shot | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
Published (cosine) | 98.1 | 98.9 | 93.8 | 98.5 |
This Repo (cosine) | 92.0 | 93.2 | 75.6 | 77.8 |
This Repo (l2) | 98.3 | 99.8 | 92.8 | 97.8 |
miniImageNet | ||
---|---|---|
k-way | 5 | 5 |
n-shot | 1 | 5 |
Published (cosine, FCE) | 44.2 | 57.0 |
This Repo (cosine, FCE) | 42.8 | 53.6 |
This Repo (l2) | 46.0 | 58.4 |
I used max pooling instead of strided convolutions in order to be consistent with the other papers. The miniImageNet experiments using 2nd order MAML took me over a day to run.
Run experiments/maml.py
to reproduce results from Model-Agnostic
Meta-Learning
(Finn et al).
Arguments
NB: For MAML n, k and q are fixed between train and test. You may need to adjust meta-batch-size to fit your GPU. 2nd order MAML uses a lot more memory.
Omniglot | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
k-way | 5 | 5 | 20 | 20 |
n-shot | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
Published | 98.7 | 99.9 | 95.8 | 98.9 |
This Repo (1) | 95.5 | 99.5 | 92.2 | 97.7 |
This Repo (2) | 98.1 | 99.8 | 91.6 | 95.9 |
miniImageNet | ||
---|---|---|
k-way | 5 | 5 |
n-shot | 1 | 5 |
Published | 48.1 | 63.2 |
This Repo (1) | 46.4 | 63.3 |
This Repo (2) | 47.5 | 64.7 |
Number in brackets indicates 1st or 2nd order MAML.