Open dudzicp opened 8 months ago
to test this, consider sequence: QVQLQESGPGLVKPSTLSLTCTVCGVSINSGDYWGSRIRQHPGKGEWIAYMDSGNTYYKESLQSVTMSIDCKNQFCLKLSVNAADTAVYYCARAFRPYNSRPFDYRGQGTLVTVSS numbered to kabat scheme
this case was handled properly:
X X X X I X X
m m m d m ..
1 2 3 - 4 ..
this was not:
X X X I I X X
m m m d m ..
1 2 3 - 3A ..
With existing logic both cases would be numbered as in first case
…insertions